This is not Hillary Clinton! They are running out of body doubles!
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (78)
sorted by:
IMO any image post claiming "This isn't the real person" should automatically be expected to feature SIDE BY SIDE IMAGES and point out areas of alleged differences, for readers to compare and make up their own minds.
Simply posting a single image and saying "Yep, even though this looks like her, trust me, IT ISN'T!!" isn't helpful. With nothing to compare it to, this image appears to be the harpy bitch we all know and loathe.
It is a bit lazy not to have some source, picture, clarity...
Hit up the Daily Mail Photographer for a better photo. Read entire thread for the absent sauce which I apologized for and posted.
Anyone with a memory and NOT suffering from prosopagnosia needs no comparison photo. It's just obviously not Killary.
This ^ KEK!
You are right. In this case, it's obvious enough anyway, but yes there should still be the added comparison.
Yup. It's The Hag.
Aight but this doesn't look anything like Hillary or her most common doubles.
You guys who are saying that are making my point. To the casual observer, the person you're trying to convince, yes it does look just like Hillary. So, just saying "It doesn't look like her" with no proof is completely ineffective. From infancy, humans are hardwired to believe their eyes in facial recognition.
So a visual comparison should be a no-brainer redpill. People need to see it, not just be told.
Are you implying you're a casual observer? Because no one in their right mind would think OP's pic is of Hillary, dude.
I also agree that the picture looks just like Hillary Clinton. Hillary caught in a maniacal laugh but its her. Have you ever noticed how you look different than the norm in some pictures you take either because of how you were smiling or the face you had or the lighting or were caught mid laugh or talking? That is going to happen to everyone esp someone as photographed as Hillary
Except I am, and although no one knows for sure, I think it could be—as do a number of others commenting in this thread. So there goes that theory, dude.
If you have proof one way or the other, we're open-minded to seeing it. Instead of merely ridiculing, show some evidence. The way people do when they're demonstrating differences between things. That's all we're saying.
IMO…do your own research, you’ll see what we are talking about
The OP did the research and made a post.... they should present the research with evidence, not unsubstantiated assertions.
Do you want me to post how the sky is falling, and then reply "don't believe it, then do the research"... it's not helpful.
Omg who needs a side by side of killery? We have been seeing her face for god knows how many years…..geeeeesh. Take a chill pill for your fellow fens.
Who the fuck doesn't know what Killary looks like. That is clearly not her. The human brain is designed to recognize faces. That's why you remember someone even from 30 years later.
DD…a meme can have text on the picture/photo or it can have a text as a headline accompanying a picture or photo. It’s a Digital War we are fighting and winning.
IMO do YOUR own research before making the post, so you can present at least some hint of evidence to support your claim, is all I'm saying