How are you that oblivious? I worry about people like you.
Calling her a sexist slur (which I use myself) without *actually reading and comprehending *the SC case is just absurd.
She operates by the rule of law and values integrity in what it means to be a Justice. She did not say that she 'disagreed' with the merits sought by the applicants, but rather that the use of an emergency docket that lacked the formal proceedings of a SC case was not the platform to instill decisions that could be used to force the court to have similar assessments.
Full briefing and oral arguments means we get to assess the justifications of the SC on both sides.
There is a reason they added their consensus, rather than choosing not to. The SC case did not make any determination about 'religious freedom' nor did it even say that Maine is particularly violating their constitutional right by failing to provide the means of applying for such exemptions.
Sorry my set of beliefs do not align with yours, but to call me a 'leftist' is laughable and only indicative of your ignorance. I value dialogue that is reasonable and productive, not jabs that lack any substance and only serve to provide material evidence that some of us here lack character and class.
Stupid cunt.
Sexist identified who can't read
How are you that oblivious? I worry about people like you.
Calling her a sexist slur (which I use myself) without *actually reading and comprehending *the SC case is just absurd.
She operates by the rule of law and values integrity in what it means to be a Justice. She did not say that she 'disagreed' with the merits sought by the applicants, but rather that the use of an emergency docket that lacked the formal proceedings of a SC case was not the platform to instill decisions that could be used to force the court to have similar assessments.
Full briefing and oral arguments means we get to assess the justifications of the SC on both sides.
There is a reason they added their consensus, rather than choosing not to. The SC case did not make any determination about 'religious freedom' nor did it even say that Maine is particularly violating their constitutional right by failing to provide the means of applying for such exemptions.
Sorry my set of beliefs do not align with yours, but to call me a 'leftist' is laughable and only indicative of your ignorance. I value dialogue that is reasonable and productive, not jabs that lack any substance and only serve to provide material evidence that some of us here lack character and class.
https://www.reddit.com/user/Nevy_8
BOO HOO