There is a reason why the Court rulings are called 'opinions'. The dissenting view written by Gorsuch is powerful, but is not law, nor is the majority opinion. There is NO LAW for working adults to be vaxxinated.
I believe the court refused to hear the merits of the case because it asked for injunctive relief before a full briefing and arguments could be heard. This perhaps is a case of putting the cart before the horse.
Dissent is not law.
There is a reason why the Court rulings are called 'opinions'. The dissenting view written by Gorsuch is powerful, but is not law, nor is the majority opinion. There is NO LAW for working adults to be vaxxinated.
I believe the court refused to hear the merits of the case because it asked for injunctive relief before a full briefing and arguments could be heard. This perhaps is a case of putting the cart before the horse.
I believe it will be revisited by the court.