Xiden creates a logical fallacy by equating TV commercials with reality:
Based on small glimpses of culture, one might assume half or more of all relationships involve some sort of race-mixing. If a person who had no information about the US or Europe were to see our television, magazine, billboard, and storefront advertisements, he might assume there were virtually zero normal white men anywhere to be found. The combination of white women with black men is hands down, the most common mixed-race couple depicted in advertising; that combination will be the focus of this essay.
A study of over two million online dating interactions revealed distinct racial preferences between groups. White women responded most frequently to white men, and least frequently to black men. Sexually transmitted disease rates per the 2016 Center for Disease Control speak for themselves.
In terms of combined median incomes of interracial marriages, black husbands with white wives earned the lowest amount of any other combination. The black husband and white wife combination were also the least educated. Of the interracial combinations, marriages between whites and blacks were found to be the least stable, and the most likely to result in divorce. The divorce rate is higher in all interracial marriages for white women relative to a white marriage.
A 2015 study examined the outcomes of women that have children with black men, the results were staggering. Currently, 70% of black children are born out of wedlock, however when the mother is white and the father black, the rate jumps to 97%. 98% of white mothers studied reported the father does not support their children financially, 97% report the father is not in the child’s life, and 97% of the women have used welfare to help support themselves and their children. Only 10% of women that have children with black men out of wedlock end up marrying. The vast majority of white women that have children with black men live far below the poverty line.
A 2013 study of intimate partner violence in relationships, surveyed nearly ten-thousand people, the authors hypothesized that interracial couples would experience higher levels of violence compared to intra-racial relationships. They found that compared to white relationships, both black couples and interracial couples experience statistically significant higher levels of relationship violence.
No, it's a co-efficient between cultural connection and genomic closeness. A Japanese man would never be considered Nigerian. At the genetic level it is expressed as expanded familial ties between shared ancestry. It's a medical hard science and not subjectivised to "World peace man". Ethnocentrism is the basis by which nations of people form democratic self determination. As soon as you pour 35 million Somalis into Japan the ethnic harmony has turned into division aka diversity. Divide and rule. See South Africa.
Of course a person would never be considered another person.
There are DIFFERENCES.
My point is.
Why are those differences a BIG DEAL in the big picture of things?
Me being a black man. And my friend being a white man.
Ok..
What does that really mean?
Nothing much in the bigger picture of things. Why is it when we die.
Our skin is one of the first things to go?
Because, obviously, plainly, hispanics, somalis and the like do not produce a surplus to maintain what anyone would consider an acceptable civilisation. Black man is not a problem, latino is not a problem, the firehose importation of different cultured and lower IQ genomic peoples en masse is a death knell. Which, obviously, is exactly why they've done it.
If there was an acultural IQ screen before import, minimum requirement of 105 needed, no one would have an issue with it, IQ tests are banned for all these purposes as I understood it because they were considered racist.
IQ is a bullshit stat.
I suggest you read this book.
https://www.amazon.com/Psycho-Cybernetics-Maxwell-Maltz-audiobook/dp/B06XRJZN8Q/ref=sr_1_2?dchild=1&keywords=pyschocybernetics&qid=1635710673&qsid=139-9910671-3335615&sprefix=Pyschocy%2Caps%2C95&sr=8-2&sres=0399176136%2C0143111884%2C0735202850%2C1641522410%2C1607968010%2C1981089152%2C0671221507%2CB00BWT4482%2C164611633X%2CB00I8OJRU4%2C0262537842%2C141658580X%2C179420637X%2CB083S1TT6K%2CB00OH7AD5E%2C1607966573&srpt=ABIS_BOOK
This books talks about how some of the most successful people ever. Were not the smartest people.
Most of the higher IQ needs now. Are automated by computer AI that is superior to human IQ.
IQ = Overrated
And yet when used is the most effective predictor for long life success and plots crime rates and anything else you'd care to measure. I'm not an IQ maximalist, I understand it's not perfect, but as far as it's predictive framework goes for large groups of people, it's fine, because it works. As for the advancement of neural networks etc, that's not the issue, the issue is on the lower end of the schedule where smashing a woman in the face and just taking her stuff / raping her seems like a fine idea in that moment.
When aggregate IQ slips under 90, you go from a society to nicaragua. If you go from 100 to 110, you get a better standard of public transport. One is not like the other.