If the goal is to reduce the world population to a small fraction of what it is now, I think this strategy makes sense. They only produce about 5% or less lethal shots, that way people continue to get the shots. If 100% of people were dying after getting the shot, nobody would take it after seeing that. That's why I think most of the shots are saline or some other placebo. It's not worth risking your life with this Russian roulette vax. And even if you survive one shot, you're gonna have to keep getting boosters. Eventually your luck will run out.
I also believe that the first round of vaccines may have even had a much smaller percentage of lethal doses, much less than one percent. The initial introduction of the vaccine needed to not be immediately tainted with excess deaths.
I guess they didn't want everyone dropping dead or being severely injured all at once as that would have been too noticeable. I suspect the 'faulty' jabs could still cause ADE, just not immediate death or other significant harm.
This touches on something we discussed earlier, how the possibility exists that this "tainted" batch of jab juice may have been sent to specific areas....
That would be pretty fucked up if it was solely related to vaccine deaths, I like to believe it was a mental thing like 5% will be lost forever in terms of not being able to cope with all of their heroes being pedophiles/enablers/corrupt/put to death or jailed for objectively good reason
If the goal is to reduce the world population to a small fraction of what it is now, I think this strategy makes sense. They only produce about 5% or less lethal shots, that way people continue to get the shots. If 100% of people were dying after getting the shot, nobody would take it after seeing that. That's why I think most of the shots are saline or some other placebo. It's not worth risking your life with this Russian roulette vax. And even if you survive one shot, you're gonna have to keep getting boosters. Eventually your luck will run out.
I also believe that the first round of vaccines may have even had a much smaller percentage of lethal doses, much less than one percent. The initial introduction of the vaccine needed to not be immediately tainted with excess deaths.
Couldn't agree more. By the 5th or 6th Vax booster, those that recieved it are going to be fucked, imo.
It's the same way they gradually increased voter fraud.
I guess they didn't want everyone dropping dead or being severely injured all at once as that would have been too noticeable. I suspect the 'faulty' jabs could still cause ADE, just not immediate death or other significant harm.
This touches on something we discussed earlier, how the possibility exists that this "tainted" batch of jab juice may have been sent to specific areas....
Exactly...well stated illustration of a complicated subject...
Didn’t Q mention something about 4-6% not surviving to see the end?
That would be pretty fucked up if it was solely related to vaccine deaths, I like to believe it was a mental thing like 5% will be lost forever in terms of not being able to cope with all of their heroes being pedophiles/enablers/corrupt/put to death or jailed for objectively good reason
I’ve read on GAW people who did the 1st shot but will not get any more. They may have dodged a bullet