"The study does stress that vaccination has a clear personal health benefit, drastically reducing the chance of serious illness or death once infected with COVID-19."
The chance of death and serious illness were ALREADY low (or non-existent) before inoculation. This is a moot point they love to repeat over and over again.
Don't want to die from this cold? Dont get jabbed and stay away from the hospitals.
Lancet is responsible for harpooning HCQ early in the Plandemic killing many millions (directly and indirectly), serving as the basis for FDA policy restricting HCQ use and clearing the pathway for Depop Juice EUA.
Sure, study was withdrawn a week later, but you know how these things work.
Like all major scientific journals, Cabal infiltrated or owned and no longer to be trusted. Many long, storied histories and reputations totally scuttled.
Conclusion: FDA petitioned the bogus Meta-analysis study published in the Lancet to justify the policy, already decided. It was a totally bogus study utilizing fabricated (made the shit up) data out of some non med "company" in San Francisco.
Most Normie dullards don't even know the study was retracted. FDA policy still stands.
The point of publishing any study in the Lancet is for peer review...... a good number of the published studies have not stood up to scrutiny.....
Now the rest of the magazine is with editorial bias...... and publishes personal opines that may or may not be based on facts .....
But the Studies are written and presented based on scientific methodology and on the evidence presented by that study..... and if the study has not followed that methodology or has been selective in reporting results etc then it won’t be accepted as a ‘Peer Reviewed’ study.....
If Fauci and Gates hadn’t aided and abetted the Covid-19 being released around the world we wouldn’t be talking about this. This was planned for years, otherwise why would they have been ready with all the test kits, why would Obama have depleted are stockpiles with Ebola and Zika and not replenished. This was a deliberate attack on the world.
"The study does stress that vaccination has a clear personal health benefit, drastically reducing the chance of serious illness or death once infected with COVID-19."
The chance of death and serious illness were ALREADY low (or non-existent) before inoculation. This is a moot point they love to repeat over and over again.
Don't want to die from this cold? Dont get jabbed and stay away from the hospitals.
Fuck Lancet. Fake news lying mother fuckers.
Yea, there credibility went out the window last year after they published a fake peer review.
Lancet is responsible for harpooning HCQ early in the Plandemic killing many millions (directly and indirectly), serving as the basis for FDA policy restricting HCQ use and clearing the pathway for Depop Juice EUA.
Sure, study was withdrawn a week later, but you know how these things work.
Like all major scientific journals, Cabal infiltrated or owned and no longer to be trusted. Many long, storied histories and reputations totally scuttled.
As Dr. Zelenko pointed out the FDA decided to bury HCQ after the Lancet report had already been retracted.
Conclusion: FDA petitioned the bogus Meta-analysis study published in the Lancet to justify the policy, already decided. It was a totally bogus study utilizing fabricated (made the shit up) data out of some non med "company" in San Francisco.
Most Normie dullards don't even know the study was retracted. FDA policy still stands.
Um how can they even be used as a reference when they knowingly published falsehoods
Yo, Lancet! Is this a real study this time??
The point of publishing any study in the Lancet is for peer review...... a good number of the published studies have not stood up to scrutiny.....
Now the rest of the magazine is with editorial bias...... and publishes personal opines that may or may not be based on facts .....
But the Studies are written and presented based on scientific methodology and on the evidence presented by that study..... and if the study has not followed that methodology or has been selective in reporting results etc then it won’t be accepted as a ‘Peer Reviewed’ study.....
WWG1WGA
Lol, which is why I made it clear in the title what the source was. It's a data point, right?
I hear ya
If Fauci and Gates hadn’t aided and abetted the Covid-19 being released around the world we wouldn’t be talking about this. This was planned for years, otherwise why would they have been ready with all the test kits, why would Obama have depleted are stockpiles with Ebola and Zika and not replenished. This was a deliberate attack on the world.
Better save this one too!
The Lancet wrote that disinformation article on Hydroxychloroquine that caused more victims of COVID19 to die for lack of care. WE WILL NOT FORGET!
The same Lancet as the one which told us to stay away from HCQ because it’s deadly & dangerous… well.. F*CK you Lancelet!
A report from The Hill four days ago about the same year-long UK study: https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/579068-vaccinated-just-as-likely-to-spread-delta-variant-as-unvaccinated-study
Is citing or quoting the lancet really a good idea?
They did the bogus "study" on HCQ that was used to get everyone afraid of a safe, cheap, and extremely widely used medication