Donald Trumps own testimony “I pushed the FDA harder than they’ve ever been pushed before” “I’m the father of the vaccines” “go get your vaccines”
Things that Trump done: instituted Warp Speed, pushed the FDA to forgo the usual safety protocols despite the fact that the testing phase resulted in 100% of animals dying when the testing was abandoned. Trump indemnified Pharma against liability. And, as above, he encouraged everyone to get them.
He is the Charles Manson of the piece, corralling everyone to carry out his evil deeds.
See, here's the thing. Your whole argument is centered around a whataboutism that you will only generally touch with a 10 foot pole.
If you weren't arguing disingenuously, you would use evidence and case examples as to what made Manson innocent even though the population saw him and fam guilty af. The problem for you is, anyone that's spent any time reviewing the details and evidence of that case can easily come to the same conclusion as the jury that convicted him.
But you're a lazy-ass glowie with a shit argument. So instead of making a real case, you're going to disappear because you can't correlate the two without being disingenuous in the process. lol
Dense, but right. I'll take it.
Name the fallacy.
There’s lots of logical fallacies. Which one was committed?
False Equivalence.
Use that to get back on topic. This is your chance to shine and correlate the two:
Manson was found guilty based on both his testimony and evidence provided in a court of law.
What do you have other than your TDS and feelers, turbo?
I'll wait.
Donald Trumps own testimony “I pushed the FDA harder than they’ve ever been pushed before” “I’m the father of the vaccines” “go get your vaccines”
Things that Trump done: instituted Warp Speed, pushed the FDA to forgo the usual safety protocols despite the fact that the testing phase resulted in 100% of animals dying when the testing was abandoned. Trump indemnified Pharma against liability. And, as above, he encouraged everyone to get them.
He is the Charles Manson of the piece, corralling everyone to carry out his evil deeds.
He begs to be given credit, give him it.
What have I said that’s untrue?
See, here's the thing. Your whole argument is centered around a whataboutism that you will only generally touch with a 10 foot pole.
If you weren't arguing disingenuously, you would use evidence and case examples as to what made Manson innocent even though the population saw him and fam guilty af. The problem for you is, anyone that's spent any time reviewing the details and evidence of that case can easily come to the same conclusion as the jury that convicted him.
But you're a lazy-ass glowie with a shit argument. So instead of making a real case, you're going to disappear because you can't correlate the two without being disingenuous in the process. lol
tl;dr - Let's go, Brandon!
Like I said. False Equivalence.