You may have heard us discussing various legislation that exists to protect our rights and to preserve our existing legislation, and that this is why the Trudeau has not been able to implement Federal law to pus their agenda. And folks, this is painfully obvious as we are being controlled through very weak legislation and low levels of the government.
We have found a new piece of Federal legislation that is going to knock your socks off - and this may be the KEY to what is holding them back (along with the Canadian Bill of Rights) from creating a national vaxx policy.
It's an obscure piece of legislation called the Statutory Instruments Act, and ya, it's an odd name, but it's a pretty cool Act! And one that we LOVE dearly. And why do we love it so much? Because, freedom lovers, this Act is going to make it almost an impossible task for the Feds to override our rights through Federal legislation.
The purpose of this Act, among other things, is to examine how each piece of Federal legislation is implemented... and the clincher folks... to ENSURE IT DOES NOT TRESPASS ON OUR RIGHTS UNDER THE WONDERFUL CANADIAN BILL OF RIGHTS.
Despite how things appear, the government does not have a great command over Canada. This is evident as they are implementing policies through provincial and municipal orders, and as we know these cannot trump Federal legislation. There is case law that states Provincial orders cannot override our fundamental rights. It's all a game, one made of smoke and mirrors.
Here is the excerpt from the Act with the provision that preserves our rights under the Bill:
Examination
(2) On receipt by the Clerk of the Privy Council of copies of a proposed regulation pursuant to subsection (1), the Clerk of the Privy Council, in consultation with the Deputy Minister of Justice, shall examine the proposed regulation to ensure that:
-
(a) it is authorized by the statute pursuant to which it is to be made;
-
(b) it does not constitute an unusual or unexpected use of the authority pursuant to which it is to be made;
-
(c) it does not trespass unduly on existing rights and freedoms and is not, in any case, inconsistent with the purposes and provisions of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Canadian Bill of Rights; and
-
(d) the form and draftsmanship of the proposed regulation are in accordance with established standards.
We must continue to push on in this battle. Know that the cards have been dealt in our favour. We MUST learn our rights and how to asset them. This is something we have never had to do before, but together, we can do this!
It starts with saying no, and it closes with HERE'S WHY. And this Act is one of the reason why.
#WEGOTTHIS
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/s-22/
(reposting for a friend - C5)
We can, there is a mechanism in which the government can hold a referendum on an issue, the whole nation can vote on it.
I can only remember 2 in recent memory (might be more), the last one was on gay marriage, the one before was a referendum on turning Australia into a Republic.
If Australia goes the Republic route we will have a chance to draw up the laws that govern the republic. As it is our current form of government is 'constitutional monarchy' and it's apparent that it sucks.
Sorry M, but wrong
a) the Marriage thing was a plebiscite, NOT a referendum
b) Government laws have been illegal and false since the Fed government altered the Constitution in the mid-70's WITHOUT going to referendum, which is required by the 1901 Constitution
i.e. They changed Queen of England etc into "Queen of Australia" which is a legal fiction.
c) Under the legal and correct constitution (1901) Australians are protected and our rights are protected as per common law. Common law is the law of the land for the past 2000+ years. It's clear, its solid, its based on natural law and the law of God, and it is what was codified in the US constitution.
We do NOT want to go a republic under their maritime law system, because it would strip us of our lawful freedoms and rights, just like the Roman republic did.
Common law is natural law, maritime aka statue law is civil law, aka roman city law.
Who championed the republic of Australia movement? Goldman Sachs Scion Turnbull. Why? Because this takes us one step further away from the foundation of our protections under the original constitution.
FYI, I used to think exactly the same way you do. USA = republic. AUS = const. monarchy. Therefore, republic good, const monarchy bad.
But its not true. Our rights and freedoms are protected under the original constitution which is actually rooted in the const. monarchy of the UK.
So, what do we do?
One, the original sovereignty of this land actually still belongs to the original owners of the land under common law - aka the Indigenous. They are the true common law sovereigns, as as men or women born in this land, we are also natural heirs to that sovereignty. Problem is, the government of Australia, usurped that sovereignty over the course of the 1900's and mad themselves the sovereigns over "australia".
Two, we must restore the correct and original order of creation, where creator has authority over created. God created men and women (and therefore has authority over us), men and women created government, government created corporations and "legal persons" which are lifeless, non-natural entities.
These principles of common law, which emerged and manifested via the British common law system (that all "lawful" laws come from and are rooted in natural law aka God's law), are the BASIS of the US constitution.
So, Three, in the future, once we restore the correct order where the People are the sovereigns, NOT the government, THEN we can institute a new constitution that finally puts in clear black and white that sovereignty lies with the People and that government MUST NOT EVER violate or usurp that sovereignty.
The laws of government were ONLY ever meant to control and manage government, NOT the people. Because the created has NO real authority over the creator.
Under natural (common) law, if I hurt you, you can seek damages, or you can forgive, its up to you. Under state law (legislation) now a crime becomes a crime against the Government (the State) and they will screw you whatever the case.
OK, getting a tad off topic here, but believe me, this is the real key to understanding how the fricken heck the Cabal got so much power, and why in Australia, our governments have all turned out to be psychopaths.
Worth checking out.
e.g. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_PLp8BKB5E
Oh awesome! Can't tell you how grateful I am for your effort, as you could probably tell I was a bit iffy about the details of referendums and the like.
So glad you posted!