Some say to end federal funding of using animals in medical research. How about funding for ALL medical research until the industry is cleaned up?

posted 3 years ago by Cat_Anon 3 years ago by Cat_Anon +54 / -0

"Gasp! How can you be against making medical break throughs?!" you scream.

No, I am in favor of medical break throughs, and that is why I believe this is what must be done.

In the past year, we have seen Ivermectin annihilate Covid in Uttar Pradesh and Indonesia in about a month's time (combined population, about 530 million). Yet, we see those who are FUNDED be the ones that do all in their power to keep this medicine from the people. They are not ignorant of the success of Ivermectin elsewhere. They KNOW it is successful, and THAT IS EXACTLY WHY THEY WISH TO KEEP IT FROM US.

The problem is not small, it is WHO, NIH, CDA, and thousands of hospital administrators, doctors, and pharmacies across the country that are connected to the money are are compromised. Do you really think Covid is one of the rare diseases where the medical industry seeks to keep the cures from the people?

Funding "medical research" for those mentioned seems to mean "We will give you this money if you keep any breakthroughs from ever seeing the day of light."

Think of all the cancer research fundraisers we have all participated in over the decades (think pink ribbon), think March of Dimes. Yet nothing ever changes. Cancer patients continue to get surgery, radiation, and chemo. Those with MS still end up in wheelchairs. Those with Alzheimer's still lose their cognitive abilities. Those with diabetes continue to inject themselves with insulin.

Can anyone really say we've seen any meaningful medical breakthroughs in recent decades?

I pray to God that those keeping the cures from the world get the most severe punishments ever, and then funding for medical research can finally become meaningful.

2 comments

2 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (2)

sorted by:

▲ 4 ▼

– Taco12 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

How about end ALL federal funding unless it is decided on by "we the people"! When something as big as 1.6 Trillion plan appears before Congress, it should be held to an election style vote. Provided 2020 gets fixed. We should not be letting a select handful of people decide to create a budget deficit in the TRILLIONS!

permalink save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– Fikkan 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Why the fuck provide any tax money to that industry ever?

It's not like the shit isn't very very good at making money.

I would call for a deep and hard forensic financial investigation to every swinging dick and sucking hole legislator and department minion in the fedzilla as well as all who've ever had a position of any power within the pharma industry.

I suspect not much of that money "spent" by the fedzilla on the pharma goes anywhere near funding anything other than the bank accounts of the depraved and degenerate destructionists through skim, kickbacks, and "political donations".