They also have no authority to make up laws. Mandates are not laws nor legally binding. And if a company wants to make it their policy, they are violating 18 USC 242 - Deprivation of Rights under color of law. How? The FDA admitted that the vaccine is killing more people than it's saving. Therefore if they adopt a policy that forces someone to endanger themselves, they are violating the actual law.
I don't have it on my phone so you'll have to bare with me. If you can't wait, it was during their live stream in September regarding booster approval. I have the link saved at home with the timestamp.
They also have no authority to make up laws. Mandates are not laws nor legally binding. And if a company wants to make it their policy, they are violating 18 USC 242 - Deprivation of Rights under color of law. How? The FDA admitted that the vaccine is killing more people than it's saving. Therefore if they adopt a policy that forces someone to endanger themselves, they are violating the actual law.
And you really think the courts have our back?
Depends on the court. But my freedom does not hinge on their discretion
Sauce on "FDA admitted..."?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFph7-6t34M&t=15684s
I don't have it on my phone so you'll have to bare with me. If you can't wait, it was during their live stream in September regarding booster approval. I have the link saved at home with the timestamp.
The FDA admitted nothing. Kirsch brought info to them in a presentation.
Hosted on the FDA's stream. It is an admission.
Here is Kirsch talking about that:
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2021/10/27/for-the-public-record-critical-questions-fda-must-address-about-vaccine-safety/
And here it is hosted on the FDA's official Youtube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFph7-6t34M&t=15684s
I listened to the stream. It was a guy by the name of Kirsch presenting info to the FDA. He is not FDA.
And who hosted that information?