It's hilarious, because the first article uses the 14th Amendment's right to bodily autonomy to defend abortion. Nevermind the fact that abortion denies the unborn child the right to life, so abortion clearly violates the 14th Amendment.
I wonder, why the right to bodily autonomy does not apply to the vaxx mandate...
What's worse is the argument is always presented as "force the jab because you aren't allowed to harm other people with your virus and we must do something about it"; meanwhile they will harm another human being in the womb by terminating its life at will. There's a clear double standard with a hefty helping of severe mental gymnastics.
And then they call the unborn child a clump of cells...
No more a clump of cells than they are. I'm not even necessarily completely pro life, but I'm all for the heartbeat bill. Which still allows abortions to take place for those cases in which a heartbeat cannot be detected yet.
It's so well written that anyone prochoice who has a problem with it likely didn't even take the time to read the bill.
I am pro life insofar as health of the mother and heartbeat. It's a middle ground that should bridge sides together in agreement, yet neither side wants to meet in the middle of that bridge.
Anyway, I reject bad faith arguments from leftists outright now.
Here are the two threads for trolling if one so desires:
https://old.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/qmidof/no_really_roe_is_supported_by_the_text_and/
https://old.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/qmiu28/bidens_workplace_vaccine_mandate_is_legal_moral/
It's hilarious, because the first article uses the 14th Amendment's right to bodily autonomy to defend abortion. Nevermind the fact that abortion denies the unborn child the right to life, so abortion clearly violates the 14th Amendment.
I wonder, why the right to bodily autonomy does not apply to the vaxx mandate...
What's worse is the argument is always presented as "force the jab because you aren't allowed to harm other people with your virus and we must do something about it"; meanwhile they will harm another human being in the womb by terminating its life at will. There's a clear double standard with a hefty helping of severe mental gymnastics.
And then they call the unborn child a clump of cells...
No more a clump of cells than they are. I'm not even necessarily completely pro life, but I'm all for the heartbeat bill. Which still allows abortions to take place for those cases in which a heartbeat cannot be detected yet.
It's so well written that anyone prochoice who has a problem with it likely didn't even take the time to read the bill.
I am pro life insofar as health of the mother and heartbeat. It's a middle ground that should bridge sides together in agreement, yet neither side wants to meet in the middle of that bridge.
Anyway, I reject bad faith arguments from leftists outright now.
They call it a clump of cells and call it a day.
That is an insult to clumps of cells.