It’s because Big Journalism is being paid by Big Pharma to not disclose the truth. In fact, Big Pharma is paying Big Journalism to actively hide the truth around the world. Why do you think the COVID journalist Alex Berenson got kicked off Twitter? Why did the corporate media unleash a hate campaign against feminist icon Naomi Wolf? Why isn’t ex-Pfizer chief scientist Dr. Michael Yeadon allowed to speak? How is it possible that the inventor of mRNA vaccines himself, Dr. Robert Malone, is not a household name around the world? You know the answer: they have all warned us about the dangers of the new COVID vaccines. They have been silenced by Big Tech and Big Pharma because they have all dared to tell the truth.
...
That’s why the COVID-19 pandemic is being used to force everyone to get the new vaccines. That’s why natural immunity doesn’t count to anyone in the medical community. That’s why religious exemptions have disappeared at your work, along with medical exemptions. That’s why Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine (and every other therapeutic drug) were swiftly outlawed. That’s why your 5 year old child will be “encouraged” and then coerced and then forced to take the jab, just as you were “encouraged” and then coerced and then forced to take the jab. That’s why the global vaccination campaign never stops when the already vaccinated start to get sick with COVID, or young boys suddenly die from heart inflammation, or world famous soccer players collapse on TV in the middle of games. That’s why health data (whether from Israel or Sweden or Florida or your local hospital) is totally irrelevant. The vaccine is being forced on everyone because the vaccine and the vaccine passport are the essential tools of a global surveillance system that will end everyone’s basic human freedom.
You have been warned.
Of course the name is based in Latin, but those who named it absolutely knew the implications of the naming in modern language and culture. It is sigil magic, not a coincidence or oversight.
Agreed.
It seems to have been named by the lab of William D. McElroy who did most of the early research on Luciferin: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_D._McElroy
He was also founder of the "World Cultural Council", which sounds like a cabalist globalist retreat.
Just looking at his alma mater section, Pasadena College and Stanford, he was almost surely palling around with Crowley mentee, Jack Parsons, satanic occultist/"rocket scientist"(he really just blew things up in the desert with his buddies) and future cult leader L.Ron Hubburd, who were practicing Babylon Rising ceremonies, amongst who knows what other sick rituals, at his house in Pasadena, The Parsonage, where all the academic and military "intelligentsia" of the day hung around in those years.
Babylon Rising or Babylon Working are blood/sex magic rituals that attempt to conceive the antichrist. It is rumored, with plenty of legitimate circumstantial evidence that Barbara (Bob) Pierce, later known as Barbara Bush, was conceived in this type of ritual in France via her mother Pauline and Crowley himself. As much as the cabal tries to promotes Parson as a "rocket engineer" and obscure and downplay Parson's ties to Crowley, there is plenty of remaining correspondence and Parsons was the head of the OTO Agape Lodge. NASA was founded by a bunch of dorky and creepy Crowley satanists, and are still running that shitshow and mist other major nwo orgs today.
*The World Cultural Council members are very interesting, especially the recent "award winners". The last in 2019 is a Chinese biotechnologist, born in America but educated and working in China, specializing in nanotech, the world leader in carbon nanotubes technology, especially in regards to the electronic stimulation of this nano tech.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhong_Lin_Wang
The whole section on his work and the probable, imo, current implications of his work are mind-blowing.
Very interesting. I saw McElroy also went to Reed College, which despite being a tiny college, is one of the magnets of the universe for amorality including people like Steve Jobs
The apple doesn't fall far from the apple tree.
Yeah, Reed College attracts a lot of big money for no easily recognizable reason. I think some of it is because undergrads can create their own major, I knew someone who "majored" in female pirates. But attracting kids with rich parents who can't even buy into an Ivy can't be the only reason they attract so much money, probably getting Deep State MKUltra $$ (or whatever it goes by today) like Stanford, USC and many others, but those schools are very science oriented and Reed is pretty much the liberalist of all liberal arts schools. Considering social engineering has proven to be more powerful than mechanical or chemical engineering, it makes more sense.
Don't be a fool. The use of "light bearer" to name two chemical compounds that produce light is not "symbolic" other than to recognize the reality of what it does. A man walking along with a lantern is a "lucifer" by the Latin meaning. You guys make me shake my head. "No, no, the obvious meaning is not relevant---we must look for the occult meaning." So, this means that fireflies are Satan's insects? And I guess when wooden matches were called "lucifers" it was because striking one would summon the Devil, right? ("But...but, it smells like brimstone!")
Yes, we must look at the occult when dealing with occults. You must be new.
You are assuming what you need to prove. The use of the Latin term "lucifer" in conjunction with "light-bearing" chemicals is literal, an obvious meaning. There is no occult meaning, where there is no occult significance. (Is a Cyalume lightstick a "devil's wand"? Not unless you have a religious opposition to fireless emergency light.)
I am only new to this kind of stupidity. I am pretty familiar with chemistry.
I am also familiar with chemistry as it is a large part of the work I do. Pharmakeia itself refers to magic and witchcraft in Greek. You are seriously underestimating the occult influence in modern science. Nice chat, it's been noted that only one side of devolved into juvenile name-calling.
I doubt you are new to stupidity, look within ma'am. Again, In am also familiar with chemistry, as, again it's a large part of my work.You sound like a bot, repeating yourself over and over. This is not about chemidtry, it is about etymology and no one naming a substance in modern science would not understand the connection. We are dealing with ocvultistss, smoothbrain, so one looks at their motivations through that lens. You have nothing of value to add for me. Stop replying.