This is very interesting data. But let's remember, this data is a fragment of the big picture.
There were far, far more deaths caused by these "vaccines" than listed here.
One can also accidentally extrapolate from this data that the deaths are over, which is clearly not the case. I know folks around here understand that, but sending this to normies without proper context could lead them to believe that. Deaths will always be occurring from this shot because it's injecting and then asking the body to manufacture the most lethal element of the covid 19 virus every time (the spike protein) someone gets the shot or a booster.
You raise an excellent point here. There's a lot of data and statements from doctors that the VAERS data represents at best 1% of the total vaccine injuries and deaths.
But looking at this specific batch data, your point is an excellent one in that it could completely skew the results.
I appreciate what the author of this article is trying to do, but it's such a small data set and it's vulnerable to the exact kinds of unknowns that you just adroitly referenced.
This is very interesting data. But let's remember, this data is a fragment of the big picture.
There were far, far more deaths caused by these "vaccines" than listed here.
One can also accidentally extrapolate from this data that the deaths are over, which is clearly not the case. I know folks around here understand that, but sending this to normies without proper context could lead them to believe that. Deaths will always be occurring from this shot because it's injecting and then asking the body to manufacture the most lethal element of the covid 19 virus every time (the spike protein) someone gets the shot or a booster.
You raise an interesting point.
What if it's just that red states are more likely to report VAERS incidents than doctors in blue states?
You raise an excellent point here. There's a lot of data and statements from doctors that the VAERS data represents at best 1% of the total vaccine injuries and deaths.
But looking at this specific batch data, your point is an excellent one in that it could completely skew the results.
I appreciate what the author of this article is trying to do, but it's such a small data set and it's vulnerable to the exact kinds of unknowns that you just adroitly referenced.