Its interesting that the Diana movie 'Spencer' is opening today (11.5), exactly 4 years, to the day (11.5.17), after the ONLY Q DROP to mention Diana, by name. How many coincidences...? - The Great Awakening

Its interesting that the Diana movie 'Spencer' is opening today (11.5), exactly 4 years, to the day (11.5.17), after the ONLY Q DROP to mention Diana, by name. How many coincidences...? (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 3 years ago by Nfld709 3 years ago by Nfld709 +251 / -0

39 comments download

39 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (39)

sorted by:

▲ 8 ▼

– LoneWulf 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

Don't feel any pity for Trevor Rees-Jones, her bodyguard. Wanna know what he's doing now?

"Trevor is now reportedly working as the global head of security for vaccine giant AstraZeneca."

https://www.the-sun.com/news/3140601/trevor-rees-jones-princess-diana-bodyguard-car-crash-survivor-2/

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– bidiadicc123 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Oh, no pity whatsoever. Interesting that the only survivor couldn't remember what happened

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 5 ▼

– LoneWulf 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Convenient, no?

Diana, who was a stickler for wearing her seatbelt, wasn't wearing one the night of the accident. Why didn't Rees-Jones insist upon it that night? If she did have it on, then who took it off?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– 335K 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

You can't make this shit up. NCSWIC.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q