Poor Big Bird...Ruffled his feathers...
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (53)
sorted by:
Do you believe a zoo's veterinarian will ADMIT IT? How do you suppose "proof" will be obtained? Them filming the jab and posting it? I'm not betting THAT will happen...ESPECIALLY NOW that "anti-jab conspiracy theorists" are watching.
I know it is. That's why I read through each of the links, nonne of which can provide a link between animal deaths and vaccines.
Vets have admitted that they've vaxxed other animals. How come none of those animals are dying, and only animals that they report as not yet being vaxxed?
...I trust few "reports or sources". Since we're on the same playing field shouldn't we be looking elsewhere for answers? Right now the answers are pending imo.
Yes, I do. Considering they released articles previously stating they would vaccinate other animals, I don't understand why they would omit that they would vaccinate giraffes.
Proof would be obtained by them at least stating that the giraffes had gotten the shot, which they hadn't. For me, proof would also apply if they found a cause of death that wasn't linked to the vax, but that might not be enough for you, and I understand that.
Regardless, you've posted articles detailing their plans for vaccinating (primarily, to primates, felines, and canids). The animals so far that have died in the "rumor mill news" article you posted are none of these (elephants, giraffes, seals, and ostriches). Additionally, there were causes of death listed for each one and they varied (mass on lungs, C-section, etc)
That "rumor news" article is an aggregate site, not a single article. There will be no admissions by any veterinarians or lab personnel. It is what it IS, therefore we will just have to watch. The human "trials" are obviously more important and where our time should be spent tho, eh?
So then why assume that the animals were vaxxed if the information is pending? Isn’t that illogical to assume that conclusion?