I mean it’s hard to focus with all that glee sets in that the treasonous bastard was really dead OMG WHATS HAPPENING ITS SO QUIET WITHOUT HIS CORRUPT RUSSIAGATE PUSHING ISIS TERRORIST SPIDERWEB MAKING POW ABANDONING phew it happened again what was I saying?
It didn't seem complicated when I first saw it. Q said no name would be in the headlines in 30 days. Exactly 30 days later, to the minute, the McCain family announced his death. It was an odd time, and it seemed odd to me that the news gave the exact time of their announcement to the minute. And it wasn't the time of death. It was the time of the announcement. I don't know of that ever being a newsworthy fact.
You're right, but in terms of getting normies to understand is where it gets tricky because of having to explain the connections between the post dates, time stamps and all.
IMO the tippy top proof was the easiest to get normies to grasp that there was more going on, for contrast.
How hard is it for someone to understand that a message predicted no name would be in the headlines and exactly 30 days later, to the very minute, no name's death was announced by his family, and the time of that announcement was actually reported in the news? It's a very simple fact.
You would think so, but you say Q predicted his death 30 days to the minute, they say "proof" and then either get lost in the understanding of the formatting and the timestamps.
I totally agree that it SHOULD be the case though.
The no name proof was unbelievable when spelled out.
It's too bad that the explanation is too complex for most normies.
I mean it’s hard to focus with all that glee sets in that the treasonous bastard was really dead OMG WHATS HAPPENING ITS SO QUIET WITHOUT HIS CORRUPT RUSSIAGATE PUSHING ISIS TERRORIST SPIDERWEB MAKING POW ABANDONING phew it happened again what was I saying?
It didn't seem complicated when I first saw it. Q said no name would be in the headlines in 30 days. Exactly 30 days later, to the minute, the McCain family announced his death. It was an odd time, and it seemed odd to me that the news gave the exact time of their announcement to the minute. And it wasn't the time of death. It was the time of the announcement. I don't know of that ever being a newsworthy fact.
You're right, but in terms of getting normies to understand is where it gets tricky because of having to explain the connections between the post dates, time stamps and all.
IMO the tippy top proof was the easiest to get normies to grasp that there was more going on, for contrast.
How hard is it for someone to understand that a message predicted no name would be in the headlines and exactly 30 days later, to the very minute, no name's death was announced by his family, and the time of that announcement was actually reported in the news? It's a very simple fact.
You would think so, but you say Q predicted his death 30 days to the minute, they say "proof" and then either get lost in the understanding of the formatting and the timestamps.
I totally agree that it SHOULD be the case though.