The WTC towers were specifically designed to withstand being hit by an airliner.
They had an exoskeleton of structural steel beams.
Which apparently could be cut through like butter by airplane wings extending nearly 100 feet out, which were light frames with a thin skin of aluminum. The wings didn't break off. Nope, they cut through many inches of structural steel.
The plane slipped right into the building like it was made of butter.
You can see it happen. No plane. If there was a plane there it would be covering up the explosion.
You really should use some of the better quality video sources for that claim. Your text is right but that video link does nothing but make me squint at my 1440p monitor.
The left wing of the first plane disappears in frame before its about to hit; i always thought it was just poor quality of vhs tapes but maybe it was CG/holograms all along??
The point is that you can see the explosion, and there is no plane between the camera and the explosion.
It isn't a question of quality or speed of the airplane vs. frame rate. There is nothing there. Just the explosion. Starting at the center which would have been occluded by an airplane if an airplane had been there, and then all along the wing-shaped holes.
The WTC towers were specifically designed to withstand being hit by an airliner.
They had an exoskeleton of structural steel beams.
Which apparently could be cut through like butter by airplane wings extending nearly 100 feet out, which were light frames with a thin skin of aluminum. The wings didn't break off. Nope, they cut through many inches of structural steel.
The plane slipped right into the building like it was made of butter.
You can see it happen. No plane. If there was a plane there it would be covering up the explosion.
https://files.catbox.moe/bsvmvo.mp4
You really should use some of the better quality video sources for that claim. Your text is right but that video link does nothing but make me squint at my 1440p monitor.
Source
https://youtu.be/miA8Td4oNcY?t=69
The left wing of the first plane disappears in frame before its about to hit; i always thought it was just poor quality of vhs tapes but maybe it was CG/holograms all along??
The point is that you can see the explosion, and there is no plane between the camera and the explosion.
It isn't a question of quality or speed of the airplane vs. frame rate. There is nothing there. Just the explosion. Starting at the center which would have been occluded by an airplane if an airplane had been there, and then all along the wing-shaped holes.
No planes hit any buildings on 911, fren.
That is why you never find any legitimate videos that show it.
Caroline Dries' footage - she was a student in her flat at the time. (Now she runs the godawful Batwoman TV show lol)