The judge is far better than most but he is still allowing the prosecution to get away with violating the rules of the court and the judge has not bothered to censure him or hold him in contempt.
Not always needed, though. Remember the Epstein case.
How about prosecuters that don't go after innocents, defense that doesn't try to squirm criminals out of their accountability, judges that don't become activists, and juries that can't be intimidated?
Somebody was looking out for Rittenhouse. I expected him to be railroaded.
I wouldn’t even say he’s being hostile as much as he’s preventing hostility and malpractice in his courtroom.
The judge is far better than most but he is still allowing the prosecution to get away with violating the rules of the court and the judge has not bothered to censure him or hold him in contempt.
Not always needed, though. Remember the Epstein case.
How about prosecuters that don't go after innocents, defense that doesn't try to squirm criminals out of their accountability, judges that don't become activists, and juries that can't be intimidated?
Too much to ask, I guess.