Says the man who wouldn't have the first clue to sending a TV picture back from the Moon. The fact that camera technology has had half a century of improvement doesn't cross your mind? Or that the lunar environment is rather harsh? Or that the bit rate available for transmission is far lower than what we are used to with the internet? There's nothing fake about something that is real. The lunar gravity is hard to mimic.
No because I know stopmotion and a shitty Hollywood set when I see one. You think they were talking to Nixon on a landline with no delay? That's retarded. Nobody has been to the moon dude. Nobody has left "low earth orbit ". You believe in cartoons and want to tell me I'm the stupid one.
No, I worked in the business and know what I am talking about. A delay of a few seconds is hardly noticeable in a normal conversation. Men went and returned. You are one of the strange people that so fervently want it not to be true, that you turn your eyes away from all the factual evidence. Be happy with all your cartoons. By your own words, that's all you have.
Yeah I'm calling bullshit on you there buddy. You obviously don't even know that they had troubles getting a signal to the Felix Baumgartner jump which is magnitudes closer and about 55 years newer technology. You clearly have a terrible case of cognitive dissonance if you think that moon mission was real. The fact that nasa has been caught lying dozens if not hundreds of times should be enough to make you wonder why that is. I have plenty of proofs that the earth is not a ball. I also happen to have proof of a flat earth too if you'd like that as well.
Call it what you want. You don't have 3 degrees in aerospace science or have worked in the industry for 40 years. The Boeing Company's Lunar Orbiter probes took photographs of the Earth at the distance of the Moon in 1966-1967, returned by radio encoding. Spherical Earth, pal. Somebody else having problems doing something else is just a sad fact of life. It doesn't stand as any argument of the Apollo program getting imagery back from the Moon---and it is a pretty interesting indication of how crummy your critical thinking is.
NASA lies about "climate change," but it is possible to find out exactly what they are lying about and what the truth is---from their own records. As to the Moon landings, too many eyes and ears. It is all true. They might even fudge a little bit about the data from Mars, but there is no doubt they have sent probes to Mars. There is no falsehood about the loss of the Challenger and the Columbia. You trivialize and disdain these deaths by claiming them to be fictitious. (A good friend of mine lost a good friend of his on one of those disasters).
You have no proofs whatsoever. You and your kind don't even have a map that can be reconciled with reality. You should have one outstanding fact that supports your claim. But no, you have lots of little cavils that amount to ignorance or misunderstanding of ordinary physics. You live in a world where ordinary people have flown directly over the North pole and noticed nothing other than ice. We have a research station at the South pole.
You like proofs? Read the way in which Eratosthenes measured the radius of a spherical Earth. Can't be disproven.
Says the man who wouldn't have the first clue to sending a TV picture back from the Moon. The fact that camera technology has had half a century of improvement doesn't cross your mind? Or that the lunar environment is rather harsh? Or that the bit rate available for transmission is far lower than what we are used to with the internet? There's nothing fake about something that is real. The lunar gravity is hard to mimic.
No because I know stopmotion and a shitty Hollywood set when I see one. You think they were talking to Nixon on a landline with no delay? That's retarded. Nobody has been to the moon dude. Nobody has left "low earth orbit ". You believe in cartoons and want to tell me I'm the stupid one.
No, I worked in the business and know what I am talking about. A delay of a few seconds is hardly noticeable in a normal conversation. Men went and returned. You are one of the strange people that so fervently want it not to be true, that you turn your eyes away from all the factual evidence. Be happy with all your cartoons. By your own words, that's all you have.
Yeah I'm calling bullshit on you there buddy. You obviously don't even know that they had troubles getting a signal to the Felix Baumgartner jump which is magnitudes closer and about 55 years newer technology. You clearly have a terrible case of cognitive dissonance if you think that moon mission was real. The fact that nasa has been caught lying dozens if not hundreds of times should be enough to make you wonder why that is. I have plenty of proofs that the earth is not a ball. I also happen to have proof of a flat earth too if you'd like that as well.
Call it what you want. You don't have 3 degrees in aerospace science or have worked in the industry for 40 years. The Boeing Company's Lunar Orbiter probes took photographs of the Earth at the distance of the Moon in 1966-1967, returned by radio encoding. Spherical Earth, pal. Somebody else having problems doing something else is just a sad fact of life. It doesn't stand as any argument of the Apollo program getting imagery back from the Moon---and it is a pretty interesting indication of how crummy your critical thinking is.
NASA lies about "climate change," but it is possible to find out exactly what they are lying about and what the truth is---from their own records. As to the Moon landings, too many eyes and ears. It is all true. They might even fudge a little bit about the data from Mars, but there is no doubt they have sent probes to Mars. There is no falsehood about the loss of the Challenger and the Columbia. You trivialize and disdain these deaths by claiming them to be fictitious. (A good friend of mine lost a good friend of his on one of those disasters).
You have no proofs whatsoever. You and your kind don't even have a map that can be reconciled with reality. You should have one outstanding fact that supports your claim. But no, you have lots of little cavils that amount to ignorance or misunderstanding of ordinary physics. You live in a world where ordinary people have flown directly over the North pole and noticed nothing other than ice. We have a research station at the South pole.
You like proofs? Read the way in which Eratosthenes measured the radius of a spherical Earth. Can't be disproven.