Appeals Court Affirms Injunction Against Joe Biden’s OSHA Vaccine Mandate – Full 22-Page Ruling
(theconservativetreehouse.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (41)
sorted by:
I've never heard of it. Are you referring to a notary public? Otherwise, on what basis would it be filed in a court?
Look, if you are not sure, then it might be better not to say it unless it is confirmed.
An affidavit must be notarized, signed in the presence of witnesses, and the affiant must swear that the facts contained in it are true and correct.
Once the affidavit is witnessed and attested to by a notary public or other official, it holds the force of law and binds the individual to the truthfulness of the information that they have provided.
https://www.legalnature.com/guides/what-is-an-affidavit-heres-how-to-write-one
Instead of providing your employer with a vaccine card, you give them a copy of your affidavit as "proof" of your compliance.
The affidavit won't be filed in court unless you get terminated. Then you file a lawsuit against your employer for firing you for being unjabbed or untested when it "isn't true", and your "proof" is your sworn affidavit. Your affidavit, of course, is perjured testimony, but since it's based off of your own first hand knowledge and nobody else's, it can't be rebutted even if it's an obvious, bald-faced lie.
Exactly. Except every lending institution has a notary public and it is always attested to by a witness. The notary is this witness. I don't have to go to a clerk of the court. Albeit, that's another source.
Thanks anyway. I already have a good grasp on this. I've done this before with clerks of courts and lending institutions. All one needs is a the State certified witness and their seal. A lending business has this as well.
I think your reasoning is flawed as how significant this is. It's only a notorized witness. Anyone can do this. It does not stand as some overriding law or exemption from an EO. There's other mechanisms for this.
I disagree, it is more than simply a notarized witness. It is a sworn statement under oath establishing a set of facts.
Think about it this way. What if you are double jabbed but lost your vaccine card. What are you supposed to do? Get jabbed again? A person in that situation would absolutely be able to file an affidavit attesting to the truth of those facts and I can't see how an employer would have any legal grounds to terminate them. You were fired not because you were out of compliance with the companies mandate but because you lost your vaccine card? That would put a company on shaky legal ground in my opinion.
Exactly.
To be clear, I'm not saying this will get you an exemption or override the mandate. I'm saying it's a catch-22 where you can lie about your vaccine status and can't be challenged on it, and anyone who tried could (probably) be sued under a variety of legal theories.
I think this is a cowardly way to try to keep your job, but I think it might be a great way to set a company up for a lawsuit, and I think it's time to get very aggressive with any private entity who tries to enforce the Mark of the Beast. We are in a 4th generational war, and any trick or tactic we can use to damage our opponents or their minions should be employed.
You are confirming my case. This is exactly what a public notary does and why they must be registered and certified by the State. Notary public are found in the courts for this same reason.
It's already on record and one would get a duplicate. An affidavit is not going to carry much weight in this case. You'll still need to get a duplicate.
This type of thinking is (1) dishonest, (2) gives credibility to already unlawful vaccine passports and (3) helps the enemy. One can not cheat and lie their way to freedom. This is despicable behavior. Stand up for your rights and do not collaborate with the beast system.