After reading multiple journals I am seeing a trend of the vaccine working to eleviate symptoms but then the efficacy wears off and your body is much more immune compromised than before ever taking this vaccine. My conclusion is that the covid vaccine is a soft kill bio weapon and not a vaccine at all. Do not take it.
This is my fear, that in the coming years there will be increased deaths for many different reasons due to compromised immune systems, and there won't be an easy way to directly link it to these "vaccines" (or doctors will just continue to deny the va$$ine issues). Higher yearly death rates will just become the new normal....
Still concludes that "benefits of vaccination outweigh risks" (with no numbers to justify the obvious jump in autoimmune reactions). Not the first paper posted here where they stick in the party line like that. First the "benefits" have to be debunked.
21 of 232603 does equate to around the 0.1% they state in their intro:
Overall, severe neurological complications including autoimmune disorders affecting the nervous system are exceedingly rare (<0.1%)
But this is one study for one reaction. These guys can look at their percentages and say 'Yep, all fine'. Add in other studies e.g. (fabricated examples) 0.1 for myocarditis, another one for pericarditis, another for cardiac issues etc etc and things don't look quite so rosy.
Separating the reactions the way they are in studies makes the problem look less, but I think when we start to compile these studies we might be able to get a percentage that concerns people.
Coupled with your observation of the benefits being debunked (and I think progress is being made gradually on that- Israel's a good example) we might be turning the tide gradually as their 'science' catches up with our common sense.
The debunking part rests on demonstrating that the damage outweighs the "lives saved" which is a hypothetical, regardless of the person the other day who assured me that a controlled study would establish certainty. Too many things wrong, starting with the fact that Moderna and Pfizer both sabotaged their original trials by un-blinding them and then giving the control group the vaccine. And then there are all the injection errors like gave saline, gave shot wrong, bad vaccine batches, all of which can only be estimated. Not to mention a year of diagnostic data dependent on a faulty test given by people motivated by Pharma profits to find cases. It's a hard issue to put in terms most people can grasp because not only is the difference of estimated and real effective rate something novel requiring math, but because of all the slop in record keeping. Even new studies keep putting in some party line.
I tend to use examples like Midazolam in care homes and Remdesivir and ventilators in hospitals to explain to people that death rates were artificially inflated, getting into mathematical discussions is neither a strong point of mine, nor a method likely to hold ovine attention..
You are quite right, their deliberate obfuscation of the methods and data required have stumped any real response to things as they unfold. That in itself could hold valuable ammunition though- ''Look, these people who can't properly frame an experiment want to give you your 5th booster, might something be wrong?''
Have had some success framing it as a monetary scheme too- taxes (us) pay for it, politicians profit, doctors profit, they get no mandate we do, the first doses you paid for didn't work as advertised and they want you to buy more? Name any other aspect of business in which the retailer would still be in business. Crickets. I'm starting to like crickets.
After reading multiple journals I am seeing a trend of the vaccine working to eleviate symptoms but then the efficacy wears off and your body is much more immune compromised than before ever taking this vaccine. My conclusion is that the covid vaccine is a soft kill bio weapon and not a vaccine at all. Do not take it.
This is my fear, that in the coming years there will be increased deaths for many different reasons due to compromised immune systems, and there won't be an easy way to directly link it to these "vaccines" (or doctors will just continue to deny the va$$ine issues). Higher yearly death rates will just become the new normal....
I hope I'm wrong.
Couldn’t reason with the older people in my family. Begged them to wait until this flu season to make a decision.
It's very clever. There's enough deniability that people who do not want to believe in the possibility of a genocidal government will take the vax.
The unvaxxed are realistic about evil intent.
One purpose of the vaccine is to give the victims AIDS.
--Dr. Ariyanna Love
Still concludes that "benefits of vaccination outweigh risks" (with no numbers to justify the obvious jump in autoimmune reactions). Not the first paper posted here where they stick in the party line like that. First the "benefits" have to be debunked.
21 of 232603 does equate to around the 0.1% they state in their intro:
But this is one study for one reaction. These guys can look at their percentages and say 'Yep, all fine'. Add in other studies e.g. (fabricated examples) 0.1 for myocarditis, another one for pericarditis, another for cardiac issues etc etc and things don't look quite so rosy.
Separating the reactions the way they are in studies makes the problem look less, but I think when we start to compile these studies we might be able to get a percentage that concerns people.
Coupled with your observation of the benefits being debunked (and I think progress is being made gradually on that- Israel's a good example) we might be turning the tide gradually as their 'science' catches up with our common sense.
The debunking part rests on demonstrating that the damage outweighs the "lives saved" which is a hypothetical, regardless of the person the other day who assured me that a controlled study would establish certainty. Too many things wrong, starting with the fact that Moderna and Pfizer both sabotaged their original trials by un-blinding them and then giving the control group the vaccine. And then there are all the injection errors like gave saline, gave shot wrong, bad vaccine batches, all of which can only be estimated. Not to mention a year of diagnostic data dependent on a faulty test given by people motivated by Pharma profits to find cases. It's a hard issue to put in terms most people can grasp because not only is the difference of estimated and real effective rate something novel requiring math, but because of all the slop in record keeping. Even new studies keep putting in some party line.
I tend to use examples like Midazolam in care homes and Remdesivir and ventilators in hospitals to explain to people that death rates were artificially inflated, getting into mathematical discussions is neither a strong point of mine, nor a method likely to hold ovine attention..
You are quite right, their deliberate obfuscation of the methods and data required have stumped any real response to things as they unfold. That in itself could hold valuable ammunition though- ''Look, these people who can't properly frame an experiment want to give you your 5th booster, might something be wrong?''
Have had some success framing it as a monetary scheme too- taxes (us) pay for it, politicians profit, doctors profit, they get no mandate we do, the first doses you paid for didn't work as advertised and they want you to buy more? Name any other aspect of business in which the retailer would still be in business. Crickets. I'm starting to like crickets.
I think I saw a previous post of yours like this. Just bought some Lugol's iodine. Thank you.
Thank you for the detailed information response. Very helpful.
Sometimes I wonder if suicide weekend will ensue when people learn how screwed they are.