"it's just a mandate, mandates are not law".
On the surface this is a correct and perfectly logical statement. But know why I don't like it?
What happens if our corrupt and illegitimate Congress makes it a law? Now we have shot ourselves in the foot by implying we have to follow it because it's law. I don't care if they make a law that says you have to get the jab or face a firing squad, I'm not gonna follow unjust laws.
It kinda reminds me of the line I heard a lot and have even been guilty of saying myself "it's not even FDA approved"... Until it was. Then what? We all had to change our line of thinking. Good logic does not require this kind of tweaking.
Maybe I'm just being pedantic but I wanted to give my two cents. Thoughts on this?
Great point on the FDA-approved thing.
If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so.
Agreed, fren!
I got really discouraged when the FDA approved that frankenjab, so now I don't give them the benefit of the doubt anymore. I could absolutely see them forcing through a bullshit law. And how many people would get it just because they think they're out of options?
I think we all have to draw our own lines in the sand - the hill that I am going to die on is not getting the jab - they can pass all the mandates/laws/proclamations/whatever but they are going to have to first catch me, then hold me down and inject it - good luck with that!
#WeAreNotExactlyLikeAustralia