"it's just a mandate, mandates are not law".
On the surface this is a correct and perfectly logical statement. But know why I don't like it?
What happens if our corrupt and illegitimate Congress makes it a law? Now we have shot ourselves in the foot by implying we have to follow it because it's law. I don't care if they make a law that says you have to get the jab or face a firing squad, I'm not gonna follow unjust laws.
It kinda reminds me of the line I heard a lot and have even been guilty of saying myself "it's not even FDA approved"... Until it was. Then what? We all had to change our line of thinking. Good logic does not require this kind of tweaking.
Maybe I'm just being pedantic but I wanted to give my two cents. Thoughts on this?
First, no one goes back to sleep once they wake up. It's a one way door.
Second, the FDA hasn't approved shit. They pretended to approve something, which doubles the red-pill power of the original statement once that is shown.
Regardless, use the glitches in The Matrix to red-pill. In the case of "Mandates are not Laws" this is not only a red-pill, it is a fundamental understanding of the nature of the social universe.
There is so much more to this idea than the simple showing that there is no law. Contained within this simple statement is the understanding that Mandates are Dictates, which implicitly come from a Dictator. If someone is giving out mandates, then our government is a dictatorship, not a democracy (which is a self-contradictory lie, but that's for another time).
It also helps to understand what a Law is. By recognizing that they are conflating dictates with laws they realize, at least on some level, that laws themselves are fabrications of reality. That a thing that gets written down and "voted on" all of the sudden becomes a new reality for everyone. It shows that lawmakers have the power to change reality, which is too much power.
It shows a fundamental flaw in the system, and how little their own lives mean to such a system.
Not everyone is going to get all of that completely, but it opens the door to these discoveries. It doesn't matter if it later changes. These ideas are implanted, and they counter the programming. They are worms that corrupt the system (in this case by eating away at corrupt primary programs).