If we are trying to show these people because you can't tell them, naturally the stories that come out each day have to build the displeasure. If patriots are in control, why couldn't it be that perhaps many of these heartbreaking news stories are pure fabrication, all designed to turn the lefts base against them? General Flynn has told us many times, this is a information war. We are using disinformation to destroy the communists. Instead of slowly feeding us the communist plan so nobody notices, they are cramming it down our throats so we choke on it.
I mean for God's sake, does the Biden admin really think the policies he is pushing is doing the democrats any favors? It looks as though he is intentionally trying to destroy the country and nobody from his party is telling him to stop or slowdown, you are making us look bad. His policies are destroying their chances in the upcoming elections and his party refuses to say you have gone to far? Would any political party be so stupid knowing they are setting up a scenario where they cant walk down the street? How will they hold campaign rallies? They will be heckled off the stage. Biden is ensuring a landslide when for the MAGA people, who is the man behind the mask?
Where are the pictures of the caravans on our border? Why would Trump build an entire border wall and leave a couple small sections unfinished? So he could create the narrative. Where are the parents and families of these dying athletes? How do we know there is a oil shortage? Why couldn't they just raise prices to piss people off? Mandate keeps getting pushed back and ruled unconstitutional. Trump pushing vaccines? Vote fraud is exposed and nothing is done about it, at least not yet.
Think back on the stories that pissed you off the most. Do we see them playing out in your hometown? Why couldn't these stories be white hat generated to get the outcome they desired all along? Total decimation of the Democrat party.
If devolution is real, we have combatant commanders strategically placed across the country to shut down uprisings, keep things functioning, make sure no harm comes to the people.
We were told to enjoy the show. Do you think Q would have told us to enjoy the REAL destruction of our country or something that appeared to be destroying our country. Q said it was a movie, to me that means its not real. If Trump is still in charge and we are watching a movie, maybe a lot of the fictional stories we get each day serve a couple purposes, gaslighting the public, motivating them to fight as we watch the democrats go down in flames. Yes we have enemies out there and some of these stories could be true but if they think they can push a communist agenda on the American people and we are going to just accept it, they have to be the dumbest people on the planet.
I guess what I am saying, dont get your panties in a bunch, our country is fine and we will continue living on as a free people for many years to come. These bitches are going down, hard.
Stay safe my frens!!!
WWG1WGA!!!
PS: Im on mobile, please excuse any typos.
It is absurd on the face of it to believe that men could travel nearly 500,000 miles to the moon and back on a single tank of fuel from 1968 to 1972 but that in the forty-nine years since then, we have not ventured further than four hundred miles off the planet. We are stuck in low earth orbit because we always have been. It was easier to fool the world in the low-tech era of 1972.
Believing in Apollo is like thinking it logical for the auto industry to peak with something like the 1972 Dodge Dart but then decide ever after to revert to making only cars more along the line of the 1912 Ford Model T because we just don't have the oomph to make cars as sophisticated as the 1972 Dodge Dart with today's technology.
They weren't burning propellant all the way there.
No. It's not absurd. In the vacuum of space, inertia will carry you the entire way. All you need is enough fuel to force your way through the Earth's thick atmosphere and gravity well and enough fuel to slow down a little on the way back while taking advantage of gravity.
The Space Shuttle doesn't "slow down" when it approaches the moon but it maintains it's speed while launching a tiny lander. Most of that intertia is then used for the trip home. This is why the Shuttle only needs huge fuel tanks that are dumped back to Earth almost the moment it reaches escape velocity.
The rockets don't burn any fuel for 99.99% of the trip because Star Wars is fiction.
Dude, the last Shuttle mission was in 2011.
In the late 1950s, no less an expert than Werner von Braun declared that a rocket to the moon would have to be the size of the Empire State Building to contain enough fuel for the journey. The moon mission was a Cold War propaganda stunt.
We can't replicate it because we no longer receive our news from black and white newspapers and third generation black and white video broadcast over the air to an orthicon tube.
Ah, good ole Ernie Kovacs...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4O5RXzA1s0
As Percy Dovetonsils might say, "I'm thimply pleathed thomeone caught the referenthe."
We conducted our first nuclear bomb tests in 1945 and accidentally launched a manhole cover into space with escape velocity. That disk of metal had no engine and no fuel and would have landed on the moon if we aimed it.
I appreciate your open-mindedness, however it's baseless because we launch satellites into orbit on an almost daily basis and the technology to reach escape velocity is identical but with just a little more thrust.
How many people are passengers on those satellites and how many of those satellites go to the moon and back?