A defense lawyer for radio host Alex Jones said in a Texas child custody hearing that the prominent right-wing conspiracy theorist is a "performance artist."
According to The Austin American-Statesman, attorney Randall Wilhite said in a pretrial hearing that Jones' angry rants against the government should not be used against him in the case.
Wilhite likened the idea to focusing on Jack Nicholson's performance as The Joker in "Batman" to make a point about the star actor's character.
"He’s playing a character. He is a performance artist," Wilhite said about Jones, who is battling his ex-wife, Kelly Jones, over the custody of their three children.
Jury selection in the case is starting today.
Kelly Jones argued that Jones' statements on his Infowars broadcasts show him to be "unstable" and make him unfit to be a parent.
She also called out his expletive-laced rant from two weeks ago in which he threatened Democrat U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff (CA) and used homophobic slurs.
Jones has millions listeners and has been criticized for perpetuating conspiracy theories about 9/11 and the Sandy Hook school shootings and for helping to start the Pizzagate fake news controversy.
Watch the legal discussion about the case on "Happening Now" above.
I find it shocking that people on this forum seem to hold such strong beliefs on such topics, and will also point out in other threads that "disinfo is necessary". Because that was a Q post as well correct?
Jones gets blanket benefit of the doubt for his work in trying to wake up Americans for the last 20+ years.
You and even the post you linked to put a lot of emphasis on him claiming to be a "performance actor" yet no one ever denies the validity of his claims. They always just attack him for HOW he says things.
Q said to move on. Was it even in reference to AJ? I've read a lot of Q posts, and not every line is related to the one above it. Not to mention that moving on still doesn't imply he's fake. You could also take it to mean he has served his role. Hell with all the bullshit theories on this board at any given time, maybe Q was talking directly to AJ and telling HIM to move on. Onto what? Who knows, certainly not you or I.
I would just caution anyone who takes a super hard stance on any claims like that at this moment in time. You will be setting yourself up for some major cognitive dissonance in the future when what you "knew" turns out to be wrong. There is a lot in the air at the moment. Only time will tell us where it all lands, and the simple truth is, we likely don't even have an 1/8th of the information. We only know what's dripped out. Keep your mind open.
I didn't say not to listen to Alex Jones. I listen to some even wackier people than him. Just don't give them any money.
I will say, Alex Jones is worse than most. I despise Shapiro now, but at least he doesn't frame his fans as unhinged "the end is near" streetwalker conspiracy types.
The point of Alex Jones is to be as cartoon-ish as possible. Everyone expects the clown to say the crazy stuff out loud. They never expect the clown to tell the ACTUAL truth. MSM use Alex Jones in order to tune out talking points they can't control the volume on, exactly like noise-cancelling software.
Monsanto is killing us with GMOs and new law suits are highly damaging?
Get AJ to do a piece on it, buy his talking points under the table in advance, and then prepare a counter narrative BEFORE he releases his story. Anyone who parrots his exact talking points has unknowingly allowed themselves to be victim to a prearranged counter-narrative to get on top of every single fact and figure.
AJ is a thousand times more potent to controlling the narrative than all the CNN anchors combined.
It's called Sophism -- which is a fancy way to say logical debate philosophers for hire.
Ben Shapiro is almost as bad as AJ because he is so very strong at being a paid opposition. Some have criticized him by showing every argument he uses is formulaic and is based on fluffing up one related argument to support another.
In reality, he argues for one thing in order to hide glaring flaws he introduces into the other "like" argument. He hands those over to MSM and they can rail-road him on any topic of the day they want.
I will agree, THEY DO RED PILL PEOPLE! At this point they are doing more harm to the MSM than good to control the narrative, sure. But you have to admit that CNN is doing a damn good job red-pilling people now as well, but in both cases it is mainly because the narrative's seams are exploding uncontrollably now, not exactly because they're doing the white-hat's bidding. They simply can't hide anything anymore without showing their asses.
Anyways, it's like giving someone a program that can find all the fraud in any system, except for the fraud YOU perform. If you control the cure and control the ailment then you control who succeeds and who fails. Bill Gates' legacy will be his mastery of such deception.
Alex Jones said he knew who Q was and had golf with him.
Alex Jones associate Jack Posobiec fabricated texts with a friend of his "microchip" in order to claim microchip was Q and that Q is a fraud.
"I find it shocking that people on this forum" ... is an insult to people of this forum.
"Jones gets blanket benefit of the doubt" ... there are many Q posts about Alex Jones and AJ associates being Mossad assets. Trying to claim "disinfo is necessary" on the huge volume of Q posts that are contrary to your position requires a huge amount of mental gymnastics.
You will be setting yourself up for some major cognitive dissonance in the future when what you "knew" turns out to be wrong.
Explain the worst case scenario that will happen to us if we believe Alex Jones is a Mossad asset. When we're proven wrong, what will happen that will be so drastic, cognitive dissonance will be the only remedy?
18 upvotes. You got 18 upvotes and zero downvotes with that drivel you wrote.
WTF.
You've made yourself everyone's mind-nanny, scolding us all for how badly we've treated Alex Jones and you got 18 upvotes and zero downvotes.
If anything requires cognitive dissonance to kick in it would be that.
Q has said in no uncertain terms over many, many posts that AJ and associates are Mossad assets.
Alex Jones says truths mixed with an insane persona so that the truth can be discounted and more easily packaged as conspiracy theory.
AJ associates, such as Jack Posobiec, cover for child trafficking. He's been caught posting from CIA headquarters.
Was it serving "our" cause when AJ said he went golfing with Q and then spent months in an attempt to call Q a fraud?
You don't have to know who I am. I am anon. My truth speaks for itself. You sit there trying to attack me with no better comeback than you know NOTHING about me.
Yet every point I've raised you completely ignore. Cognitive dissonance?
I love how this community takes 1 post and clings to it abiut Alex Jones is bad when Q literally said move on and gave it no more attention. The arguments I have had with some people are so nonsensical it makes my head spin. Almost like they want a violent revolution and are mad that Jones and others never call for violence....which they think is keeping us from taking action, etc... so here are some hard facts:
1: Jones has woken over 1 million people worldwide whether you love him or hate him. Even if he does some harm these Alex Jones hater shills can fuck right off until they have woken a minimum of 100k people and accurately predicted at least 5 major events a decade a head of time.
2: The Q post most reference was BEFORE Flynn interviewed with Alex Jones on Jones show prior to January 6th. As soon as it went down Jones was confused ran off air and said I need to talk to Flynn. Also Trump personally invited his team to lead the March to the white house and the infiltration started long before their group arrived and had nothing to do with jones. To this day we don't know this whole story but I suspect Trump baited the Pelosi/FBI/Antigua crowd into the whole thing and used everyone else as a smoke screen to pretend like he didn't know and fulfill the checkmarks for the insurrection act by telling people to disperse. He called us to come. To this day no one knows why.
3: Flynn and his brother are on a round table with Jones that is getting released soon. So if you think Jones is bad you better be real skeptical of Flynn and all of them or you better come around to the fact you may be wrong and he could be a white hat because clearly they are giving him air time and he is giving air time to everyone from Lindell to doctors to others.
4: People need to quit pretending they know everything because they saw some obscure video "proving" someone was "mossad" or something else. It's amazing how many claims are made with zero receipts yet the same people follow date fags who are wrong 99% of time.
5: If AJ is controlled opp he is literally the worst controlled opp in all of history. There is exactly 0 benefit to the elites having you know about the trilateral commission, builderberg, false flags, government corruption and coverups, abortions being used for genetic experiments and human hybrids, medical tyranny, sex crimes and blackmailed, etc... ZERO. If the DS wanted that out there they wouldn't be trying to constantly operate in secret not having a Texas man with 3 million devout followers screaming it from the roof tops and getting Bill Clinton is a rapist on national TV everywhere leading up to the biggest election in history. FFS people need to think sometimes
Alex Jones has been controlled opposition for as long as I remember.
He really pushed the Y2K fear hard and then doubled down on New Years' Eve 1999 by claiming the Russians were invading the United States on his radio show.
I believe it was to cause Patriots to panic and start attacking some of the locations Alex mentioned, which happened to be military assets.
Fortunately, it didn't work and it held off the Patriot Act for another year...
Alex Jones is black hat, and I think this is a cover story to hide the fact he is about to get taken down or just got taken down by Patriots.
Think about what's happened to Newsom. I'd wager Alex Jones won't be heard from for a while and this is the excuse.
For more insight into who Alex Jones really is: https://qalerts.app/?n=1341
From the article linked in the above Q post:
I find it shocking that people on this forum seem to hold such strong beliefs on such topics, and will also point out in other threads that "disinfo is necessary". Because that was a Q post as well correct?
Jones gets blanket benefit of the doubt for his work in trying to wake up Americans for the last 20+ years.
You and even the post you linked to put a lot of emphasis on him claiming to be a "performance actor" yet no one ever denies the validity of his claims. They always just attack him for HOW he says things.
Q said to move on. Was it even in reference to AJ? I've read a lot of Q posts, and not every line is related to the one above it. Not to mention that moving on still doesn't imply he's fake. You could also take it to mean he has served his role. Hell with all the bullshit theories on this board at any given time, maybe Q was talking directly to AJ and telling HIM to move on. Onto what? Who knows, certainly not you or I.
I would just caution anyone who takes a super hard stance on any claims like that at this moment in time. You will be setting yourself up for some major cognitive dissonance in the future when what you "knew" turns out to be wrong. There is a lot in the air at the moment. Only time will tell us where it all lands, and the simple truth is, we likely don't even have an 1/8th of the information. We only know what's dripped out. Keep your mind open.
Sorry.
I didn't say not to listen to Alex Jones. I listen to some even wackier people than him. Just don't give them any money.
I will say, Alex Jones is worse than most. I despise Shapiro now, but at least he doesn't frame his fans as unhinged "the end is near" streetwalker conspiracy types.
The point of Alex Jones is to be as cartoon-ish as possible. Everyone expects the clown to say the crazy stuff out loud. They never expect the clown to tell the ACTUAL truth. MSM use Alex Jones in order to tune out talking points they can't control the volume on, exactly like noise-cancelling software.
Monsanto is killing us with GMOs and new law suits are highly damaging?
Get AJ to do a piece on it, buy his talking points under the table in advance, and then prepare a counter narrative BEFORE he releases his story. Anyone who parrots his exact talking points has unknowingly allowed themselves to be victim to a prearranged counter-narrative to get on top of every single fact and figure.
AJ is a thousand times more potent to controlling the narrative than all the CNN anchors combined.
It's called Sophism -- which is a fancy way to say logical debate philosophers for hire.
Ben Shapiro is almost as bad as AJ because he is so very strong at being a paid opposition. Some have criticized him by showing every argument he uses is formulaic and is based on fluffing up one related argument to support another.
In reality, he argues for one thing in order to hide glaring flaws he introduces into the other "like" argument. He hands those over to MSM and they can rail-road him on any topic of the day they want.
I will agree, THEY DO RED PILL PEOPLE! At this point they are doing more harm to the MSM than good to control the narrative, sure. But you have to admit that CNN is doing a damn good job red-pilling people now as well, but in both cases it is mainly because the narrative's seams are exploding uncontrollably now, not exactly because they're doing the white-hat's bidding. They simply can't hide anything anymore without showing their asses.
Anyways, it's like giving someone a program that can find all the fraud in any system, except for the fraud YOU perform. If you control the cure and control the ailment then you control who succeeds and who fails. Bill Gates' legacy will be his mastery of such deception.
B.S.
Oh, and read between the lines on the article.
They are holding his kids as collateral (hostage).
He may be blackhat, but not all blackhat actors are irredeemably bad people. We won't know for certain until full disclosure.
Alex Jones said he knew who Q was and had golf with him.
Alex Jones associate Jack Posobiec fabricated texts with a friend of his "microchip" in order to claim microchip was Q and that Q is a fraud.
"I find it shocking that people on this forum" ... is an insult to people of this forum.
"Jones gets blanket benefit of the doubt" ... there are many Q posts about Alex Jones and AJ associates being Mossad assets. Trying to claim "disinfo is necessary" on the huge volume of Q posts that are contrary to your position requires a huge amount of mental gymnastics.
Explain the worst case scenario that will happen to us if we believe Alex Jones is a Mossad asset. When we're proven wrong, what will happen that will be so drastic, cognitive dissonance will be the only remedy?
18 upvotes. You got 18 upvotes and zero downvotes with that drivel you wrote.
WTF.
You've made yourself everyone's mind-nanny, scolding us all for how badly we've treated Alex Jones and you got 18 upvotes and zero downvotes.
If anything requires cognitive dissonance to kick in it would be that.
Such strong reactions. So fucking weird. You don't know half the shit you claim to.
"You", you mean Q.
Begs the question, if you're contrarian to Q, why are you here on GA, a pro-Q board?
Are you hostile to Q on everything or just Alex Jones? What other things do you shill against Q on?
I know Alex Jones from 20+ years of service to our cause. I know NOTHING about YOU.
Q has said in no uncertain terms over many, many posts that AJ and associates are Mossad assets.
Alex Jones says truths mixed with an insane persona so that the truth can be discounted and more easily packaged as conspiracy theory.
AJ associates, such as Jack Posobiec, cover for child trafficking. He's been caught posting from CIA headquarters.
Was it serving "our" cause when AJ said he went golfing with Q and then spent months in an attempt to call Q a fraud?
You don't have to know who I am. I am anon. My truth speaks for itself. You sit there trying to attack me with no better comeback than you know NOTHING about me.
Yet every point I've raised you completely ignore. Cognitive dissonance?
I love how this community takes 1 post and clings to it abiut Alex Jones is bad when Q literally said move on and gave it no more attention. The arguments I have had with some people are so nonsensical it makes my head spin. Almost like they want a violent revolution and are mad that Jones and others never call for violence....which they think is keeping us from taking action, etc... so here are some hard facts:
1: Jones has woken over 1 million people worldwide whether you love him or hate him. Even if he does some harm these Alex Jones hater shills can fuck right off until they have woken a minimum of 100k people and accurately predicted at least 5 major events a decade a head of time.
2: The Q post most reference was BEFORE Flynn interviewed with Alex Jones on Jones show prior to January 6th. As soon as it went down Jones was confused ran off air and said I need to talk to Flynn. Also Trump personally invited his team to lead the March to the white house and the infiltration started long before their group arrived and had nothing to do with jones. To this day we don't know this whole story but I suspect Trump baited the Pelosi/FBI/Antigua crowd into the whole thing and used everyone else as a smoke screen to pretend like he didn't know and fulfill the checkmarks for the insurrection act by telling people to disperse. He called us to come. To this day no one knows why.
3: Flynn and his brother are on a round table with Jones that is getting released soon. So if you think Jones is bad you better be real skeptical of Flynn and all of them or you better come around to the fact you may be wrong and he could be a white hat because clearly they are giving him air time and he is giving air time to everyone from Lindell to doctors to others.
4: People need to quit pretending they know everything because they saw some obscure video "proving" someone was "mossad" or something else. It's amazing how many claims are made with zero receipts yet the same people follow date fags who are wrong 99% of time.
5: If AJ is controlled opp he is literally the worst controlled opp in all of history. There is exactly 0 benefit to the elites having you know about the trilateral commission, builderberg, false flags, government corruption and coverups, abortions being used for genetic experiments and human hybrids, medical tyranny, sex crimes and blackmailed, etc... ZERO. If the DS wanted that out there they wouldn't be trying to constantly operate in secret not having a Texas man with 3 million devout followers screaming it from the roof tops and getting Bill Clinton is a rapist on national TV everywhere leading up to the biggest election in history. FFS people need to think sometimes
Alex Jones has been controlled opposition for as long as I remember.
He really pushed the Y2K fear hard and then doubled down on New Years' Eve 1999 by claiming the Russians were invading the United States on his radio show.
I believe it was to cause Patriots to panic and start attacking some of the locations Alex mentioned, which happened to be military assets.
Fortunately, it didn't work and it held off the Patriot Act for another year...