Right I get that.
If the judge is worried the Jury has been influenced or coerced how does he go about it?
Does he wait for their verdict and then ask them?
Edit: as in what power does the judge have to figure it out?
If it is determined that they think Kyle is innocent, but are withholding that because they fear consequences, the Judge should be able to set Kyle free.
There cannot be justice or law when vigilantes are punishing and threatening jurors.
I say bring it on, faggots! People have had enough. They can't take it anymore. The Proud Boys won't be alone in their fight. Use deadly force as necessary.
Right I get that.
If the judge is worried the Jury has been influenced or coerced how does he go about it?
Does he wait for their verdict and then ask them?
Edit: as in what power does the judge have to figure it out?
If it is determined that they think Kyle is innocent, but are withholding that because they fear consequences, the Judge should be able to set Kyle free.
There cannot be justice or law when vigilantes are punishing and threatening jurors.
I say bring it on, faggots! People have had enough. They can't take it anymore. The Proud Boys won't be alone in their fight. Use deadly force as necessary.
The judge can always render directed verdict overriding the jury. I think that is also very rare but can happen.
I'm aware of that my friend.
I was just curious about judge interactions with the jury in regards to the judge asking a juror his position.
All good, Billy blaze got me my answers.
Simply ask if they are having difficulty in reaching a verdict because of any external factors.
Awesome, thanks for that friend!