My preference is for those that have facts that refute what is being said present them, as I read stuff without attributing it to the author, then seek to validate the truth of what is presented--blind to the source of the info. An exercise of discernment, if you will.
My preference is for those that have facts that refute what is being said present them, as I read stuff without attributing it to the author, then seek to validate the truth of what is presented--blind to the source of the info. An exercise of discernment, if you will.
Sources are everything sir. otherwise you it's all theory and conjecture you assign.
I am a big believer in citing sources. I am also a big believer in not throwing out what might be valuable simply because of who reported it.