Yeah so I see you didn't get the memo: we don't need validation from others. Tucker might have been quick to assume the election was legitimate, however his job is not to be our echo chamber. If anything it is to challenge our precepts and what we think is true so we can research and confirm for ourselves.
If you don't like him anymore that's fine. But to slander him like this over a disagreement is not right. We need to be making friends with people that are like minded regardless of what they say about us or the election. We are correct. We don't need others to tell us or confirm so. And if you do, then you aren't secure in your beliefs.
To add on we have to at some point recognize that we are a "fringe" group here in our studies of Q. To normies it's another conspiracy theory the same as flat earth.
What was put forth by Q, and the theory of devolution, are quite a turn from how society has played the game for the past ~80 years, and in all reality longer then that. I think it's safe to say that even here on this board we have trouble wrapping our heads around the whole thing. You certainly can't expect passive normies to even attempt. Tucker is a normie. Then to top it off no one is infallible and correct 100% of the time. Even GEOTUS makes mistakes. As always though, time will tell.
This is what will be the most difficult process to think through. All our approaches have to be guarded with more skepticism than you, I or any of us would like, certainly more than in the past.
I truly believe this is why Trump (not a poet) started reading the poem "The Snake". Politicians, Ministers, 3-letter agencies, School Boards, Judges, key media personalities, etc. have all been schooled how to become LARPS. That is how the "INFILTRATION" began and the war is being carried out, until it is too late. Trump is playing this as well (think vaccines and placating to the examples above) until he plays "the trump card." IMO. (the ending will not be for everyone - Q)
I understand your position even though I'm not in full agreement. You should not be downvoted for having an opinion about anyone in mainstream media. However, in this instance, Tucker will provide wide exposure to Kyle's story that it wouldn't have received otherwise.
FYI, as an aside, I know for a fact that Tucker had a slight personal relationship with Hunter Biden. They lived in the same neighborhood, and Hunter helped get Tucker's daughter into a private school. Tucker has been somewhat transparent about knowing Hunter and his wife. It's an example of how the media and political class all swirl together in DC, so I understand the distrust.
I’m with you regarding your opinion of Fox but I do see value in Tucker doing this. Think of the additional exposure. He will also skewer the left narrative of white on black shooting and that the victims were angels.
Yeah so I see you didn't get the memo: we don't need validation from others. Tucker might have been quick to assume the election was legitimate, however his job is not to be our echo chamber. If anything it is to challenge our precepts and what we think is true so we can research and confirm for ourselves.
If you don't like him anymore that's fine. But to slander him like this over a disagreement is not right. We need to be making friends with people that are like minded regardless of what they say about us or the election. We are correct. We don't need others to tell us or confirm so. And if you do, then you aren't secure in your beliefs.
To add on we have to at some point recognize that we are a "fringe" group here in our studies of Q. To normies it's another conspiracy theory the same as flat earth.
What was put forth by Q, and the theory of devolution, are quite a turn from how society has played the game for the past ~80 years, and in all reality longer then that. I think it's safe to say that even here on this board we have trouble wrapping our heads around the whole thing. You certainly can't expect passive normies to even attempt. Tucker is a normie. Then to top it off no one is infallible and correct 100% of the time. Even GEOTUS makes mistakes. As always though, time will tell.
This is what will be the most difficult process to think through. All our approaches have to be guarded with more skepticism than you, I or any of us would like, certainly more than in the past.
I truly believe this is why Trump (not a poet) started reading the poem "The Snake". Politicians, Ministers, 3-letter agencies, School Boards, Judges, key media personalities, etc. have all been schooled how to become LARPS. That is how the "INFILTRATION" began and the war is being carried out, until it is too late. Trump is playing this as well (think vaccines and placating to the examples above) until he plays "the trump card." IMO. (the ending will not be for everyone - Q)
I understand your position even though I'm not in full agreement. You should not be downvoted for having an opinion about anyone in mainstream media. However, in this instance, Tucker will provide wide exposure to Kyle's story that it wouldn't have received otherwise.
FYI, as an aside, I know for a fact that Tucker had a slight personal relationship with Hunter Biden. They lived in the same neighborhood, and Hunter helped get Tucker's daughter into a private school. Tucker has been somewhat transparent about knowing Hunter and his wife. It's an example of how the media and political class all swirl together in DC, so I understand the distrust.
I’m with you regarding your opinion of Fox but I do see value in Tucker doing this. Think of the additional exposure. He will also skewer the left narrative of white on black shooting and that the victims were angels.
Kyle agreed to it. I mean, it's pretty obvious considering he allowed the camera crew to record him and all, but it's worth mentioning.
Sad that you are being downvoted. Best comment I've read all day and I completely agree.
Interesting response. I learned something from it. Thanks