Yeah so I see you didn't get the memo: we don't need validation from others. Tucker might have been quick to assume the election was legitimate, however his job is not to be our echo chamber. If anything it is to challenge our precepts and what we think is true so we can research and confirm for ourselves.
If you don't like him anymore that's fine. But to slander him like this over a disagreement is not right. We need to be making friends with people that are like minded regardless of what they say about us or the election. We are correct. We don't need others to tell us or confirm so. And if you do, then you aren't secure in your beliefs.
To add on we have to at some point recognize that we are a "fringe" group here in our studies of Q. To normies it's another conspiracy theory the same as flat earth.
What was put forth by Q, and the theory of devolution, are quite a turn from how society has played the game for the past ~80 years, and in all reality longer then that. I think it's safe to say that even here on this board we have trouble wrapping our heads around the whole thing. You certainly can't expect passive normies to even attempt. Tucker is a normie. Then to top it off no one is infallible and correct 100% of the time. Even GEOTUS makes mistakes. As always though, time will tell.
Yeah so I see you didn't get the memo: we don't need validation from others. Tucker might have been quick to assume the election was legitimate, however his job is not to be our echo chamber. If anything it is to challenge our precepts and what we think is true so we can research and confirm for ourselves.
If you don't like him anymore that's fine. But to slander him like this over a disagreement is not right. We need to be making friends with people that are like minded regardless of what they say about us or the election. We are correct. We don't need others to tell us or confirm so. And if you do, then you aren't secure in your beliefs.
To add on we have to at some point recognize that we are a "fringe" group here in our studies of Q. To normies it's another conspiracy theory the same as flat earth.
What was put forth by Q, and the theory of devolution, are quite a turn from how society has played the game for the past ~80 years, and in all reality longer then that. I think it's safe to say that even here on this board we have trouble wrapping our heads around the whole thing. You certainly can't expect passive normies to even attempt. Tucker is a normie. Then to top it off no one is infallible and correct 100% of the time. Even GEOTUS makes mistakes. As always though, time will tell.