John Paul II was a salesman for IG Farben and an actor in his spare time before joining the priesthood.
Don't act like he didn't practice Babylonian rituals like his successors Benedict and Francis.
I can tell you either haven't read or don't understand John Paul II's last encyclical. It was published in 1991 on the 100th year anniversary of Rerum Novarum.
First of all: what someone does before they join the priesthood means nothing unless they were a satanist or convicted pedophile. Do you suggest that priests/popes/etc must be without sin?
Secondly: prove it on the occult rituals
Thirdly: neither remum novarum nor the pope’s recent encyclical call for forced wealth redistribution. It is clearly you who do not understand the encyclical.
Your username is inspired by Don Quixote, who was a parody of the Jesuit Ignatius Loyola. Don Quixote also plays a part in the Skulls and Bones initiation ceremony, likely as a nod to the Black Pope.
There is a devil, a Don Quixote and a Pope, who has one foot sheathed in a white monogrammed slipper resting on a stone skull. The initiates are led into the room one at a time. And once an initiate is inside, the Bonesmen shriek at him. Finally, the Bonesman is shoved to his knees in front of Don Quixote as the shrieking crowd falls silent. And Don Quixote lifts his sword and taps the Bonesman on his left shoulder and says, "By the order of our order, I dub thee knight of Euloga.
Now, if what you're saying about forced wealth redistribution is true, how do you explain the following statement from Pope John Paul II?
Christian tradition has never recognized the right to private property as absolute and untouchable: ‘On the contrary, it has always understood this right within the broader context of the right common to all to use the goods of the whole of creation: the right to private property is subordinated to the right to common use, to the fact that goods are meant for everyone.
As far as the Babylonian rituals, you can prove it yourself when you go to Catholic Mass and praise the Blessed Virgin Mary as co-redemptrix, mediatrix, and advocate.
Jeremiah 7:18
The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead their dough, to make cakes to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto other gods, that they may provoke me to anger.
In Will Durant's Our Oriental Heritage, written in 1942, it's plain to see the Babylonians praised Ishtar in much the same way Catholics praise Mary today.
Mary is the mother of Jesus but she is not to be worshipped (or even venerated, as I know Catholics like to use that word in place of worship as if it makes a difference).
You don’t understand the words you are using, and as a result, you only use them as weapons.
Mary is co redemptrix means: helper to the redeemer (christ being the redeemer), not “co-redeemer.”
Mary is advocate, meaning she advocates to Jesus, her Son, as she did in life at the wedding of Cana.
Worship and veneration are different. No one gives offering to Mary or bakes cakes for her. Many catholics ask her to pray for them. We do not praise or worship her - we hold her in higher esteem than humans still living, though, along with angels and the cloud of witnesses and all the heavenly beings inhabiting Heaven and sharing in God’s perfection.
Calm the hatred in your heart. God loves you snd created you to love him and to love others.
Worship and veneration are different. No one gives offering to Mary or bakes cakes for her.
MOST Holy Virgin, I venerate thee with my whole heart above all angels and saints in Paradise, as the Daughter of the Eternal FATHER, and I consecrate to thee my soul with all its powers. Ave Maria.
MOST Holy Virgin, I venerate thee with my whole heart above all angels and saints in Paradise, as the Mother of the Only-begotten SON, and I consecrate to thee my body with all its senses. Ave Maria.
MOST Holy Virgin, I venerate thee with my whole heart above all angels and saints in Paradise, as the Spouse of the HOLY GHOST, and I consecrate to thee my heart and all its affections, praying thee to obtain for me from the ever-blessed Trinity all that is necessary for my salvation. Ave Maria
I understand perfectly, Don Quixote.
Consecrating one's soul, body, and heart and all its affections to the Virgin Mary is veneration, not worship, and consecrating AKA setting aside one's soul. body, and heart for a sacred purpose is not an offering by your sophist definitions, I'm sure.
Catholics most definitely refer to Mary as Queen of Heaven even though it's not mentioned anywhere in the entire Bible except as a BAD THING!
And I notice you did not address anything else I pointed out in the previous post besides the comment about Blessed Virgin Mary being the co-redemptrix, mediatrix, and advocate.
Please explain what this means-
Christian tradition has never recognized the right to private property as absolute and untouchable: ‘On the contrary, it has always understood this right within the broader context of the right common to all to use the goods of the whole of creation: the right to private property is subordinated to the right to common use, to the fact that goods are meant for everyone.
Who decides how to redistribute the private property of others according to Christian tradition?
And why do Catholics praise Mary in much the same way the Babylonians praised Ishtar AKA Ashtoreth? After all Ishtar was also the co-redemptrix, mediatrix, and advocate. Have a better answer than quabbling about the difference between worship and veneration?
John Paul II was a salesman for IG Farben and an actor in his spare time before joining the priesthood.
Don't act like he didn't practice Babylonian rituals like his successors Benedict and Francis.
I can tell you either haven't read or don't understand John Paul II's last encyclical. It was published in 1991 on the 100th year anniversary of Rerum Novarum.
https://archive.md/ZBI5l
Redistribution of wealth is not a good thing if it's forced upon the people.
First of all: what someone does before they join the priesthood means nothing unless they were a satanist or convicted pedophile. Do you suggest that priests/popes/etc must be without sin?
Secondly: prove it on the occult rituals
Thirdly: neither remum novarum nor the pope’s recent encyclical call for forced wealth redistribution. It is clearly you who do not understand the encyclical.
Your username is inspired by Don Quixote, who was a parody of the Jesuit Ignatius Loyola. Don Quixote also plays a part in the Skulls and Bones initiation ceremony, likely as a nod to the Black Pope.
There is a devil, a Don Quixote and a Pope, who has one foot sheathed in a white monogrammed slipper resting on a stone skull. The initiates are led into the room one at a time. And once an initiate is inside, the Bonesmen shriek at him. Finally, the Bonesman is shoved to his knees in front of Don Quixote as the shrieking crowd falls silent. And Don Quixote lifts his sword and taps the Bonesman on his left shoulder and says, "By the order of our order, I dub thee knight of Euloga.
https://youtu.be/JGhq6E-AjSY
Now, if what you're saying about forced wealth redistribution is true, how do you explain the following statement from Pope John Paul II?
https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/justpeace/documents/rc_pc_justpeace_doc_20060526_compendio-dott-soc_en.html
Archived link - https://archive.md/3s4KD
As far as the Babylonian rituals, you can prove it yourself when you go to Catholic Mass and praise the Blessed Virgin Mary as co-redemptrix, mediatrix, and advocate.
Jeremiah 7:18
The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead their dough, to make cakes to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto other gods, that they may provoke me to anger.
In Will Durant's Our Oriental Heritage, written in 1942, it's plain to see the Babylonians praised Ishtar in much the same way Catholics praise Mary today.
https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.61276/page/n343/mode/2up
Mary is the mother of Jesus but she is not to be worshipped (or even venerated, as I know Catholics like to use that word in place of worship as if it makes a difference).
You don’t understand the words you are using, and as a result, you only use them as weapons.
Mary is co redemptrix means: helper to the redeemer (christ being the redeemer), not “co-redeemer.”
Mary is advocate, meaning she advocates to Jesus, her Son, as she did in life at the wedding of Cana.
Worship and veneration are different. No one gives offering to Mary or bakes cakes for her. Many catholics ask her to pray for them. We do not praise or worship her - we hold her in higher esteem than humans still living, though, along with angels and the cloud of witnesses and all the heavenly beings inhabiting Heaven and sharing in God’s perfection.
Calm the hatred in your heart. God loves you snd created you to love him and to love others.
MOST Holy Virgin, I venerate thee with my whole heart above all angels and saints in Paradise, as the Daughter of the Eternal FATHER, and I consecrate to thee my soul with all its powers. Ave Maria.
MOST Holy Virgin, I venerate thee with my whole heart above all angels and saints in Paradise, as the Mother of the Only-begotten SON, and I consecrate to thee my body with all its senses. Ave Maria.
MOST Holy Virgin, I venerate thee with my whole heart above all angels and saints in Paradise, as the Spouse of the HOLY GHOST, and I consecrate to thee my heart and all its affections, praying thee to obtain for me from the ever-blessed Trinity all that is necessary for my salvation. Ave Maria
I understand perfectly, Don Quixote.
Consecrating one's soul, body, and heart and all its affections to the Virgin Mary is veneration, not worship, and consecrating AKA setting aside one's soul. body, and heart for a sacred purpose is not an offering by your sophist definitions, I'm sure.
Catholics most definitely refer to Mary as Queen of Heaven even though it's not mentioned anywhere in the entire Bible except as a BAD THING!
And I notice you did not address anything else I pointed out in the previous post besides the comment about Blessed Virgin Mary being the co-redemptrix, mediatrix, and advocate.
Please explain what this means-
Christian tradition has never recognized the right to private property as absolute and untouchable: ‘On the contrary, it has always understood this right within the broader context of the right common to all to use the goods of the whole of creation: the right to private property is subordinated to the right to common use, to the fact that goods are meant for everyone.
Who decides how to redistribute the private property of others according to Christian tradition?
And why do Catholics praise Mary in much the same way the Babylonians praised Ishtar AKA Ashtoreth? After all Ishtar was also the co-redemptrix, mediatrix, and advocate. Have a better answer than quabbling about the difference between worship and veneration?