The other day, someone posted a story about Playboy promoting pedophilia in a 1978 issue on GAW. In addition to that, the post had sketches of underground tunnels coming from the Playboy Mansion.

I showed my red-pilled wife the story which caused her to turn into an internet autist thoroughly researching the topic during which she came upon an interesting story that I'd never heard before.

In 1975, 10-year-old Brooke Shields, with the permission of her mother, was photographed totally nude, with make-up, and oiled up. A Playboy publication called "Sugar 'n Spice" published the photos. A total jaw-dropper even to us senior-level red-pilled folks.

To further the red pills, in the 1980s, Brooke tried to stop the further usage of the pictures, but a judge ruled that she was bound by the contract her mom signed, and the pictures weren't child pornography. They were even used in a museum or two.

Here's a link to the Wikipedia article about the controversy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garry_Gross

I thought this was a great way to show normies how this stuff is promoted and protected at the upper echelons of society.

If you get a normie red-pilled with this, you can lead into how the judges, political leaders, etc are all compromised. How else could a judge rule that something that's literally child porn, is NOT child porn?

The choice is YOURS to know.