Thanks best wishes and God bless. long day or i'd elaborate more but best place on interswebs since before it existed. best peoples to.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (81)
sorted by:
This aged well and can be used in many contexts...
https://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/230/791/f6e.png
cc: u/MAGAdeburger u/v8power
And yet, every day I see Patriots.win members waking up. Backfire!
I think the plan was to move Q discussion off many sites and platforms so that those sites could develop whatever their MAGA / Trump support organic message was and not hamper the development of the growth of the user base diluted with shills being able to drop in and be destructive by smearing the site as a whole as a Q-tard conspiracy sanctuary.
On therconservativetreehouse Q commentary was banned by sundance outright after sundance took a trip to D.C. and met "some people" that, paraphrasing his words, "clued him in to things going on in the background" of what was public.
After that there was a short period of mounting intolerance by the mods and sundance until anyone bringing Q up got one warning and then was banned. You got a couple of more shots with a new user name, but if you "persisted" you got locked out. A lot of people from there moved over to thedonald, then patriots.win, then GAW. I still monitor that site, and if you are Q conversant - many times you can see the thinly veiled Q messaging just under the surface of sundance articles and in the comment section.
We are not banned on patriots.win, but if you go, take your "A" game. Can get sporty at times, but always a joy in the end.
My point is, what I keep hinting at with the Ghostbuster "crossing the the streams" video clip, there is going to come a time when Q is revealed and the streams will get crossed.
BOOM!
cc: v8power
Facebook censoring of both GreatAwakening.win and Patriots.win is insanity. They've gotten smarter, or rather scarier now. Used to be that their programmed AI would detect the base url if you tried to share any links on posts, comments or direct messages, and ban you from sharing ("promotes violence"). They even had it programmed so that it would detect the urls within a picture. So the way to bypass it was to plug the address into tinyurl.com and it'd spit out a random shortened address. That worked. Could share any tinyurl link to either site. But I noticed yesterday that a friend tried to share a link to a Patriots.win post.... interestingly, the post was of a Tweet that went viral, from somebody I'm very close to. Now, if you just shared the direct Tweet link on FB, it'd post. But he tried to share the link to the Patriots.win and it was blocked. Told him to put it into tinyurl and it worked, got to me. Now today I tried to send that tinyurl link to a friend and guess what? BLOCKED. There's no way in hell programmed AI could have been set up to block that tinyurl link unless somebody clicked the link to see that it went to Patriots.win... I'm more inclined to think that'd require an actual human to be secretly reading the message, clicking the link and seeing where it went... either that, or their AI is absurdly intelligent... I don't know which is worst, Fuckerberg spying on our private messages, or scary smart AI
Web developer here. I mean, it's not hard to have a bot visit a tinyurl and see what the redirect location is. Easy machine-readable stuff—that's how your browser knows where to go, after all. As soon as anybody decides they want to check on that (like if it becomes a popular route around censorship they're trying to implement), they can have that running on production in hours.