Maybe the escalations are not just merely to draw attention away from whats happening with the Ghislaine Maxwell trial... but because Durham is about to open up a can of whoop-ass on people too senior in the swamp, who are desperate to obscure what is going on.
How many people are needed for 300k grand juries, or regular juries at a military or civilian trial? That's a big chunk right there.. in a normal era. But now? I think these will be swift and unforgiving when that phase of the operation commences.
What a delightful thought.. maybe the 'days of darkness' and threats to the internet that are being laid the narrative groundwork for right now (ie stories about solar storms) will be to try and stop all the internet/remote grand juries that might be going on.
On the other hand, if hundreds of empty offices or storefronts suddenly all get leased out and occupied by a bunch of very serious looking people with armed guards..
Might be the sort of thing thats too dicey to run via a medium so subject to disruption as the internet.
I have often wondered the same I remember just a couple years ago it was well below 200,000. The speed and volume of these makes me wonder. What amount of resources is required to make it happen? Does it indicate the size and power of the white hats? And then the opening and execution of these from a practical standpoint - I think we are talking years. Unless they are all done nearly at once via military tribunals so slowly and strategically unveiling and coordinating them is not needed.
Last I checked they had 292… oh looks like 297 now. I even made a meme about this but… I’ve always known not all 300k were Durham.
Truth is there are a ton of reasons to seal indictments. I’m not a law professional so I don’t know for certain, but I believe if you committed a felony as a minor it would be sealed because if the age. Could also be a situation where you have a law professional involved that should be kept away from the records due to conflict of interest. The point is, they’re not all Durhams. The only fact I can convey is that before 2017 there were 100k. Now there are nearly 300k federal indictments against Lord knows who. I suspect Durham or whatever white hat bunch has 100k of them combine. Only one reason, in my humble opinion, they’d have that many records. I think they want to make it official, legal, and follow every letter of the law. I hope it doesn’t all get torched like the Vatican likely will when the SHTF. This is my opinion, however unsolicited it was.
PACER does not hold classified documents. the organized criminal racket involving politicians and foreign governments most certainly is a matter of national security, so these investigations and charging documents would not be under seal uploaded to PACER, the public database, but remain classified until whatever redacted information could be made public.
Fed criminal court handled 90,000 cases last year. It could be done I suppose over a few years with a crap load of deals...which would suck in a lotta cases. Who know how many years of appeals.
That doesn't make any money, nor does it confuse people. It does make you wonder if we really are a corporation, rather than a constitutional republic.
Maybe the escalations are not just merely to draw attention away from whats happening with the Ghislaine Maxwell trial... but because Durham is about to open up a can of whoop-ass on people too senior in the swamp, who are desperate to obscure what is going on.
How many people are needed for 300k grand juries, or regular juries at a military or civilian trial? That's a big chunk right there.. in a normal era. But now? I think these will be swift and unforgiving when that phase of the operation commences.
🤞
Could the mass exodus from the labor force be driven by people sitting on thousands of Grand Juries ?
What a delightful thought.. maybe the 'days of darkness' and threats to the internet that are being laid the narrative groundwork for right now (ie stories about solar storms) will be to try and stop all the internet/remote grand juries that might be going on.
On the other hand, if hundreds of empty offices or storefronts suddenly all get leased out and occupied by a bunch of very serious looking people with armed guards..
Might be the sort of thing thats too dicey to run via a medium so subject to disruption as the internet.
I have often wondered the same I remember just a couple years ago it was well below 200,000. The speed and volume of these makes me wonder. What amount of resources is required to make it happen? Does it indicate the size and power of the white hats? And then the opening and execution of these from a practical standpoint - I think we are talking years. Unless they are all done nearly at once via military tribunals so slowly and strategically unveiling and coordinating them is not needed.
Is their evidence of the sealed indictments?
bad-boys.us
Last I checked they had 292… oh looks like 297 now. I even made a meme about this but… I’ve always known not all 300k were Durham.
Truth is there are a ton of reasons to seal indictments. I’m not a law professional so I don’t know for certain, but I believe if you committed a felony as a minor it would be sealed because if the age. Could also be a situation where you have a law professional involved that should be kept away from the records due to conflict of interest. The point is, they’re not all Durhams. The only fact I can convey is that before 2017 there were 100k. Now there are nearly 300k federal indictments against Lord knows who. I suspect Durham or whatever white hat bunch has 100k of them combine. Only one reason, in my humble opinion, they’d have that many records. I think they want to make it official, legal, and follow every letter of the law. I hope it doesn’t all get torched like the Vatican likely will when the SHTF. This is my opinion, however unsolicited it was.
EDIT: Aw crud, 264k ? Were some opened?
PACER does not hold classified documents. the organized criminal racket involving politicians and foreign governments most certainly is a matter of national security, so these investigations and charging documents would not be under seal uploaded to PACER, the public database, but remain classified until whatever redacted information could be made public.
Each state will do 10 a month. That's 500 trials going on at once. Should get through this batch in 50 years.
Larger states could do 10 before lunch.
trials take weeks...time for mass tribunals
Yeah thats what im saying. They wouldn't be typical trials they would be expedited with many more resources than normal.
Fed criminal court handled 90,000 cases last year. It could be done I suppose over a few years with a crap load of deals...which would suck in a lotta cases. Who know how many years of appeals.
Hope they are not all being stored in one place like building 10.
u/#q3784
Judges are tyrants in black robes. Someone change my mind on that.
My question. Why are there “constitutional” lawyers and judges? Shouldn’t they all be by default?
That doesn't make any money, nor does it confuse people. It does make you wonder if we really are a corporation, rather than a constitutional republic.