I also read in the FDA paperwork, as I was trying to figure out why the Mockingbirds were saying Pfizer had an FDA approved-gen-mod shot. It seems it is Comirnity that is FDA-approved and not the one being used now. In the FDA papers, it said Comirnity has several ingredients not in the original. How to you FDA approve a different shot, something that has not been tested at all, even in comparison to the EUA shot? So they saying they are the same shots (supposedly), yet there are several more undisclosed ingredients in Comirnity, so not the same shot at all. This whole thing reeks of a shell game.The FDA fully approved a "vaccinee" because it is the same as the Pfizer BioTech, but it isn't because they admit there are several different ingredients. I will try to find the paperwork and link it.
Yes you are correct. The FDA mislead everyone when they tried to say that these shots are FDA approved, they are not. It is "Comirnity" which got the go ahead but won't be available until 2024 (IIRC).
Let us not forget that one of the main pushers of what is approved is Christine Grady head of Bioethics at the NIHCC and is married to Dr Fraudci! Now the MSM says it's false that she had any input into the FDA approving all this shit, but I beg to differ.
In the approval statement, the FDA even said there is no need to have additional studies for the boosters, because although they expect the formula to be different, they wouldn't be too different.
Cut and paste to follow on u/Letsgofishing Becase it fits with his response...
On the label: "For use under Emergency Use Authorization" wasn't the Commie RNA version supposed to be the approved version? and not in production until 2023? (After the designed trials were scheduled to be completed?)
The label also says: "For RX only" as i understand it a doctor needs to examine and diagnose you before they can give you a prescription... Otherwise they are subject to loss of license to practice...and if the Pharmacy dispenses it without a prescription they lose their license to operate..
I also read in the FDA paperwork, as I was trying to figure out why the Mockingbirds were saying Pfizer had an FDA approved-gen-mod shot. It seems it is Comirnity that is FDA-approved and not the one being used now. In the FDA papers, it said Comirnity has several ingredients not in the original. How to you FDA approve a different shot, something that has not been tested at all, even in comparison to the EUA shot? So they saying they are the same shots (supposedly), yet there are several more undisclosed ingredients in Comirnity, so not the same shot at all. This whole thing reeks of a shell game.The FDA fully approved a "vaccinee" because it is the same as the Pfizer BioTech, but it isn't because they admit there are several different ingredients. I will try to find the paperwork and link it.
Yes you are correct. The FDA mislead everyone when they tried to say that these shots are FDA approved, they are not. It is "Comirnity" which got the go ahead but won't be available until 2024 (IIRC).
Let us not forget that one of the main pushers of what is approved is Christine Grady head of Bioethics at the NIHCC and is married to Dr Fraudci! Now the MSM says it's false that she had any input into the FDA approving all this shit, but I beg to differ.
From what I understand, EUA drugs can be “tweaked” as needed.
Absolutely bonkers, but actually getting full approval on an renamed EUA and then adding several more ingredients?
Someone had to get paid off. No other reasonable explanation I can come up with. EUA not deadly enough?
Yeah, what could go wrong?
If they are "tweaked" then they are a different drug than the original. I can "twerk" Tylenol with anthrax and it is the same drug? Nope!
Completely agree.
In the approval statement, the FDA even said there is no need to have additional studies for the boosters, because although they expect the formula to be different, they wouldn't be too different.
Cut and paste to follow on u/Letsgofishing Becase it fits with his response...
On the label: "For use under Emergency Use Authorization" wasn't the Commie RNA version supposed to be the approved version? and not in production until 2023? (After the designed trials were scheduled to be completed?)
The label also says: "For RX only" as i understand it a doctor needs to examine and diagnose you before they can give you a prescription... Otherwise they are subject to loss of license to practice...and if the Pharmacy dispenses it without a prescription they lose their license to operate..
Thanks for the shout-out, I have not seen this discuss and I read all of the documents 👍
CHILLING