I don't view it from this skeptical perspective because I am a shill (I am definitely not a shill.)

I view it this way because history over and over again has taught us that skepticism is necessary in dealing with the DS opponent, especially after 9/11.

Our enemies used our conservatism, our patriotism, our love for right, our disdain for wrong, our love of Country, our disdain for liberalism, our support for GW Bush, our support of "Republicans", our disdain for liberals, our energy, and our organization to advance/execute the DS agenda and most Patriots didn't see it until after the fact.

We cried tears, shouted support, waved our flags, sang the Star Spangled Banner in our homes and in our churches, while GW Bush stood atop the World Trade Center rubble with a bullhorn in one hand and his arm around a firefighter with the other.

We saw off our young men and women to war in the Middle East with hearts steadfast and minds and mouths arguing on behalf of the moral high ground/correctness of the GW Bush Admin.

We sobbed as caskets were offloaded at military bases around our Country.

Flags were placed in our yards, streets and in the windows of our homes.

When we woke up, it was too late. The Patriot Act, the EffBeeEye and the SeeEyeAye are all used against the great citizens of this Country.

We gave them our energy and support.

Be skeptical.

Don't blindly give it to them again.

Don't trust. Ask questions.

Demand that they earn our trust. Demand that they earn our support.

As Satan comes posing as an Angel of Light, so does the DS...wrapped in a flag and patriotism: robbing, stealing, murdering and destroying.

Don't help them!

Don't let them!

You may want to check your own premise:

Trump's team launched one lawsuit in each contested state none of which were heard. It went to the supreme court where it wasn't heard. Rudy Giuliani alone laid out the case for election fraud plainly and clearly continuously for about a month on his own channel (in between ads for cigars, granted).

When Giuliani brought his case before a Federal Court in Pennsylvania, this is what he said to the Judge:

"No, your honor, we are not" alleging fraud, Giuliani said, after Brann reminded him a newer version of the Trump campaign's lawsuit cut back those claims. It's a "fraudulent process," Giuliani continued.

You can find t hat fact in almost every article about Giuliani's Nov. 17th appearance before the Federal Court.

His odd PA press conference in front of the busted down Four Seasons landscaping business also was lackluster and underwhelming.

By the way, also documented in several other state cases, the Trump campaign lawyers made similar statements that the case was not about election fraud. You can read that fact in the record for your self.

From Powell's Kraken, to Lindell's cyber symposium, to Lindell's alleged Supreme Court case, to Trump Campaign's Court appearances, to the AZ Audit Result Hearing, etc. They seemingly stop short on presenting definitive evidence of election fraud.

Why?

When and where will the evidenced be presented?

How does this fit in to the winning strategy and The Plan?

Are all of these public efforts by these folks just sideshows to keep the DS busy, occupied and spinning?

What are the possible scenarios here?

You don't need to be slick if you are presenting incontrovertible proof.