threatening people into compliance is not evil. it is the basis of our entire justice system.
All of your ideas about the world are terrible.
Laws aren't threats, they're boundaries most people agree upon because it's for the good of everybody. Breaking them puts other people in danger so there are punishments for it.
I don't murder people because there's a law against it; it's morally and ethically wrong. There should be a punishment in place for transgressing that, which is why there is.
Some phony-baloney plandemic with a controversial "vaccine" doesn't give Aubrey the moral right or justification to threaten people with uncovering their medical records into compliance. She doesn't have that authority and there are laws in place specifically to prevent people from using information like that against employees. And this isn't the plague so "severity of threat" doesn't supersede law.
Stop justifying morally bankrupt threats with false equivalencies to how actual laws of justice work.
There are different magnitudes of evil. For evil to exist, a person committing said actions need only be aware of what they're doing + its negative impact on others, and yet remain completely lacking in remorse.
Which is why laws are in place. Are you actually fucking retarded? Are you reading to what you're replying to?
Also, 15-year old, stop talking like you did five tours in 'Nam. I'm 40, I've seen plenty of shit in my life, too. Evil isn't just one concrete absolute idea, it's pervasive and perverse, it louses it's way into everything because it manifests in a million ways.
Evil can be a lot of things, and someone threatening compliance via breaking co-workers' medical privacy is pretty fucking evil. It's not throwing puppies in a fire for kicks but it's still evil.
Stop pontificating with your whole "I've experienced evil first hand and therefore I'm wiser and philosophically superior to you all".
No one here is arguing that there aren't much greater magnitudes of evil, for that is certainly the case. But what this woman in the email is doing (if indeed she is aware of how her words and actions may negatively affect her constituents yet remains completely unphazed regardless) is deliberate and harmful.
As she implements a policy designed to reinforce her selfish desires even at the expense of the mental and physical stress of her employees as well as potential loss of employment for those dissenters who choose not to comply.
Evil exists on a scale of infinite magnitude. One need not only exist on the highest end of the spectrum to be considered evil.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Intent has absolutely nothing to do with whether you are evil or not.
Threatening people to get them to do what you want is evil.
This is why female managers suck.
She has no power so she uses force.
All of your ideas about the world are terrible.
Laws aren't threats, they're boundaries most people agree upon because it's for the good of everybody. Breaking them puts other people in danger so there are punishments for it.
I don't murder people because there's a law against it; it's morally and ethically wrong. There should be a punishment in place for transgressing that, which is why there is.
Some phony-baloney plandemic with a controversial "vaccine" doesn't give Aubrey the moral right or justification to threaten people with uncovering their medical records into compliance. She doesn't have that authority and there are laws in place specifically to prevent people from using information like that against employees. And this isn't the plague so "severity of threat" doesn't supersede law.
Stop justifying morally bankrupt threats with false equivalencies to how actual laws of justice work.
#y'all
There are different magnitudes of evil. For evil to exist, a person committing said actions need only be aware of what they're doing + its negative impact on others, and yet remain completely lacking in remorse.
...
Which is why laws are in place. Are you actually fucking retarded? Are you reading to what you're replying to?
Also, 15-year old, stop talking like you did five tours in 'Nam. I'm 40, I've seen plenty of shit in my life, too. Evil isn't just one concrete absolute idea, it's pervasive and perverse, it louses it's way into everything because it manifests in a million ways.
Evil can be a lot of things, and someone threatening compliance via breaking co-workers' medical privacy is pretty fucking evil. It's not throwing puppies in a fire for kicks but it's still evil.
youre wrong. take the downvotes and criticism as a sign to reevaluate your retarded line of reasoning.
Stop pontificating with your whole "I've experienced evil first hand and therefore I'm wiser and philosophically superior to you all".
No one here is arguing that there aren't much greater magnitudes of evil, for that is certainly the case. But what this woman in the email is doing (if indeed she is aware of how her words and actions may negatively affect her constituents yet remains completely unphazed regardless) is deliberate and harmful.
As she implements a policy designed to reinforce her selfish desires even at the expense of the mental and physical stress of her employees as well as potential loss of employment for those dissenters who choose not to comply.
Evil exists on a scale of infinite magnitude. One need not only exist on the highest end of the spectrum to be considered evil.
Are you laying pipe in Aubrey?
Our justice system is based on mutual respect.
I agree to follow those laws.
This bitch decided to make herself the law so she can get everyone to do what SHE wants.
She's evil. And you're evil for encouraging it.