I am not offerring straw men. I see a genuine danger of having people think "Oh, there's such a really small chance that I can get a bad batch, so why not take it? I can keep my job, etc..."
The message (of 'mostly benign batches') will make no difference to those of us who will never take it, but there are those 'on the fence' who are at risk. A video like this might 'please' us, but it puts others in danger.
Nobody should take this vax.
If you are a numbers guy (like me, a programmer), you know that you can't judge how toxic a batch is unless you know both the numerator and the denominator. 'How many bad events in this batch' divided by 'how big the batch is'.
You might call this another straw man, but I don't see anywhere, in any data set, how we know the size of each batch (how much was manufactured in the batch, and how much was destroyed in the field due to expiration, etc). Pfizer and Moderna aren't telling us, and the CDC (who admits that they know) won't disclose it to the general public.
If Batch1 has 5000 bad events in VAERS, and Batch2 has only 500 - it is not valid to say that Batch2 is 'safer' unless you know the relative sizes of the batches (the denominators). What if Batch1 was 20 times as large as Batch2? Then Batch1 would actually be the safer batch - even with 10 times the events. Simple math.
Now if you know the size of each batch, of each manufacturer, and how much of each batch was actually used (not expired or discarded), please let me know how you know. I would love to have more info.
Incidentally, I made a post over a month ago that described this exact concept (doses are mostly benign/saline, with a 'fine tweaking' to produce desired results) - so I agree that they are doing this. It's just that this data does not prove it.
Post: "If they give SALINE to almost everyone (the first time around), they still get ALL of their EVIL BENEFITS. Here's how..."
Let me explain myself ---
I am not offerring straw men. I see a genuine danger of having people think "Oh, there's such a really small chance that I can get a bad batch, so why not take it? I can keep my job, etc..."
The message (of 'mostly benign batches') will make no difference to those of us who will never take it, but there are those 'on the fence' who are at risk. A video like this might 'please' us, but it puts others in danger.
Nobody should take this vax.
If you are a numbers guy (like me, a programmer), you know that you can't judge how toxic a batch is unless you know both the numerator and the denominator. 'How many bad events in this batch' divided by 'how big the batch is'.
You might call this another straw man, but I don't see anywhere, in any data set, how we know the size of each batch (how much was manufactured in the batch, and how much was destroyed in the field due to expiration, etc). Pfizer and Moderna aren't telling us, and the CDC (who admits that they know) won't disclose it to the general public.
If Batch1 has 5000 bad events in VAERS, and Batch2 has only 500 - it is not valid to say that Batch2 is 'safer' unless you know the relative sizes of the batches (the denominators). What if Batch1 was 20 times as large as Batch2? Then Batch1 would actually be the safer batch - even with 10 times the events. Simple math.
Now if you know the size of each batch, of each manufacturer, and how much of each batch was actually used (not expired or discarded), please let me know how you know. I would love to have more info.
Incidentally, I made a post over a month ago that described this exact concept (doses are mostly benign/saline, with a 'fine tweaking' to produce desired results) - so I agree that they are doing this. It's just that this data does not prove it.
Post: "If they give SALINE to almost everyone (the first time around), they still get ALL of their EVIL BENEFITS. Here's how..."
https://greatawakening.win/p/13zgXB5572/if-they-give-saline-to-almost-ev/
Okay I misunderstood your assertion. I agree.
Thanks - it's always good to resolve a misunderstanding.