Dark winter? Don't miss this excellent Covid article: "This seasonality causes covid-19 to sweep across the United States in three distinct wave patterns: the first one starting in the north east during the spring, the second beginning in the south during the summer, and the third... "
(kanekoa.substack.com)
💊 RED PILL 💊
Genuine question, if the test is so flawed they can make up any numbers they want how can we also claim that low cases in Japan and some parts of India are due to Ivermectin and proof of it working against COVID?
I've been unable to reconcile these two claims on my own.
Is the Japan and India data based on the fact people just aren’t coming in to be tested? Also, low hospitalization and death rates are usually reported in support of these Ivermectin success stories.
Possible, not sure.
And that's a good point. Most recently regarding Japan, I'd only really seen some data on cases going down. I'll have to dig for some data on deaths/hospitalizations.
My guess is the Ivermectine and vitamin cocktail reduces viral loads to such a degree that the PCR test can't detect them. Also, the PCR tests aren't actually "flawed", the are calibrated to pick up the smallest traces of the common cold. The cycling used is ridiculously high and will detect stuff that probably wouldn't make someone sick.
No isolated virus. PCRs are based of computer virus simulation thus could be positive to anything
at least on cycles pcr is run; essentially its now operated at run until positive comes out; while its highly known that test goes very inaccurate past 30 cycles
I don’t give any credence whatsoever to either high or low case claims. High case numbers could be due to high cycle rates. Low case claims could be due to low cycle rates. Whether high or low, the PCR test was never meant to be used as a diagnoses tool (so says it’s creator). Plus, the test can’t even differentiate between influenza, the cold, or so called “covid” (so says the CDC).
No reconciliation needed if you take this approach. ANY case claim, whether high or low, is entirely bunk.
My understanding is that the PCR-based tests are not necessarily flawed, they are just carried out and thresholded to allow for a lot of false positives, including even non-COVID viruses. The good flip side of this is that the same tests must then have a low false negative rate, so the small numbers in Japan and India are very likely legit.
Don’t forget, Coke Cola & goats give a pos pcr so just sayin?
Exactly. This comes to show that the CT variable is the key to determining if an area has a high case count or not.