They are both the-earlier-the-better, HCQ isn't fast/potent enough for final stage recovery; Ivermectin seems to pull people back from the brink - although nobody should have had to go that far (or suffer at all) for this bug.
Think of it this way: HCQ is akin to getting a steroid shot to prevent, whereas Ivermectin are the heart paddles to revive if a viral or bacterial infection is not treated.
Both are excellent, but ivermectin will deliver the fastest 1-2-3 dose knockout to any and all infections, bacterial, and parasitic immediately.
Ive heard that about HCQ. Thats why the study showing HCQ didnt work was bunk. Because they only gave it to people late in the game, and gave them way too much.
I thought Ivermectin only worked in the very early stages, he doesn't look "early" to me.
Thanks for answering that. Is it Hydroxychloroquine that is more for early stages?
They are both the-earlier-the-better, HCQ isn't fast/potent enough for final stage recovery; Ivermectin seems to pull people back from the brink - although nobody should have had to go that far (or suffer at all) for this bug.
Great info! Thanks for sharing.
Think of it this way: HCQ is akin to getting a steroid shot to prevent, whereas Ivermectin are the heart paddles to revive if a viral or bacterial infection is not treated.
Both are excellent, but ivermectin will deliver the fastest 1-2-3 dose knockout to any and all infections, bacterial, and parasitic immediately.
Wow, some great information there!
I never heard about it for infections or bacterial problems as well.
Ive heard that about HCQ. Thats why the study showing HCQ didnt work was bunk. Because they only gave it to people late in the game, and gave them way too much.
and allegedly requires zinc be taken to allow absorption
Doesn't hurt to give it to him anyway.