Tell this to a lib.
When they have a meltdown that a gun maker would have no liability if gun kills someone ...
Ask them, then why should a vaccine maker have no liability if they kill someone?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
Yeah, if the gun explodes when you're firing it, the company should be liable.
If your gun is stolen and the thief shoots someone with it, the thief is liable, not the company.
But if a Pfiezer can kill you with a poison jab and get off, why shouldn't the gun manufacturer get off when the gun explodes and takes your hand with it?
I agree.
i just wanted to be funny. :P
Heh, I was kinda itching to make my little analogy.