Tell this to a lib.
When they have a meltdown that a gun maker would have no liability if gun kills someone ...
Ask them, then why should a vaccine maker have no liability if they kill someone?
Tell this to a lib.
When they have a meltdown that a gun maker would have no liability if gun kills someone ...
Ask them, then why should a vaccine maker have no liability if they kill someone?
I like the trickiness but i dont like the result which if they concede vaccine makers should be liable implies that gun makers should be also. No likey