Could be. Been thinking about this and don’t know why it never occurred to me before.
There is no way a person with General Flynn’s background makes this type of mistake. He knows DC, he knows how the DS operates, he knows where the bodies are buried.
Knowing all that, he would not talk to Kislyak when he did without knowing there would be repercussions. Knowing all that, he would not voluntarily speak to the FBI without a lawyer present.
He is not a rank amateur, he of all people in the new administration would know better than to trust these people.
There was no problem with how he talked with Kislyak. Nothing wrong at all. "repercussions"? There were no real legitimate repercussions. There were illegitimate repercussions, inasmuch as certain outcomes were that the Cabal moved, took steps, acted, and were (are) eventually out-maneuvered.
The public story is that he was hoodwinked by the FBI (strokz, etc) into having an interview because they misrepresented their intentions, etc.
I think it is far more likely that Flynn new what was going on - they (patriots) ALL knew what was going on - but the correct move was to not let the Dark State know that they knew what was going on. i.e. "playing along" with them.
For me, the answer to your thoughts here is the understanding that there is a much larger game in the works here, which includes the art of war: "look weak, when you are strong, look strong, when you are weak"
In other words, stop thinking that Russiagate, or Impeachmentgate, or any of the other operations they crafted against Trump and the Patriots were 'negatives' that had a detrimental effect on the first administration.
When you enemy has overwhelming control of the battlefield, you have to work and act to outmaneuver. In other words, there was no real way to prevent "russiagate" without actually losing a lot more ground in the overall war, compared with not preventing "russiagate" but actually winning more ground in the long term.
This is a basic and fundamental dimension of grasping the Trump/Patriot 'plan' as indicated and hinted at by Q.
Could be. Been thinking about this and don’t know why it never occurred to me before.
There is no way a person with General Flynn’s background makes this type of mistake. He knows DC, he knows how the DS operates, he knows where the bodies are buried.
Knowing all that, he would not talk to Kislyak when he did without knowing there would be repercussions. Knowing all that, he would not voluntarily speak to the FBI without a lawyer present.
He is not a rank amateur, he of all people in the new administration would know better than to trust these people.
There was no problem with how he talked with Kislyak. Nothing wrong at all. "repercussions"? There were no real legitimate repercussions. There were illegitimate repercussions, inasmuch as certain outcomes were that the Cabal moved, took steps, acted, and were (are) eventually out-maneuvered.
The public story is that he was hoodwinked by the FBI (strokz, etc) into having an interview because they misrepresented their intentions, etc.
I think it is far more likely that Flynn new what was going on - they (patriots) ALL knew what was going on - but the correct move was to not let the Dark State know that they knew what was going on. i.e. "playing along" with them.
For me, the answer to your thoughts here is the understanding that there is a much larger game in the works here, which includes the art of war: "look weak, when you are strong, look strong, when you are weak"
In other words, stop thinking that Russiagate, or Impeachmentgate, or any of the other operations they crafted against Trump and the Patriots were 'negatives' that had a detrimental effect on the first administration.
When you enemy has overwhelming control of the battlefield, you have to work and act to outmaneuver. In other words, there was no real way to prevent "russiagate" without actually losing a lot more ground in the overall war, compared with not preventing "russiagate" but actually winning more ground in the long term.
This is a basic and fundamental dimension of grasping the Trump/Patriot 'plan' as indicated and hinted at by Q.