A recent German study found a linear relationship between vitamin D levels and mortality from covid, and essentially, zero morbidity for those with a D level above 50 ng/mL.
“At a threshold level of 30 ng/mL, mortality decreases considerably. In addition, our analysis shows that the correlation for the combined datasets intersects the axis at approximately 50 ng/mL, which suggests that this vitamin D3 blood level may prevent any excess mortality."
Studies have already shown that one is 14 times more likely to die from COVID with vitamin D deficiency.
A meta-analysis of 23 published studies containing 11,901 participants found that one who is vitamin D-deficient was 3.3 times more likely to get infected with SARS-CoV-2 than one who is not deficient.
The reality is that most people’s levels are below 30 and many are closer to zero, especially among the elderly population.
With studies having shown zero correlation between lockdowns, masks, and vaccines and better COVID outcomes, there are now 142 studies vouching for the near-perfect correlation between higher vitamin D levels and better outcomes in COVID patients.
It is beyond criminal that 20 months into this endeavor there has not been a national campaign percolating down to primary care physicians to test and supplement vitamin D levels accordingly.
As the authors explain, the main cause of death from COVID stems from a “cytokine storm” when the body’s immune system releases too many toxic cytokines as part of the inflammatory response to the virus.
Vitamin D is the key regulator of those cells, and the insufficient amount of D is nearly synonymous with a greater risk for a cytokine storm.
In many ways, a cytokine storm is literally the outcome of vitamin D deficiency.
@KanekoaTheGreat
And with vitamin D levels falling as winter approaches, covid, flu, colds, and other infections will rise. The silence of the medical community on this basic health information is pitiful.
No wonder they had everyone slathering sunblock for the last 2 decades... .I hate these evil fookers.
There's a balance. Skin cancer is real. That's why supplementation is such a beautiful thing. Get the D hormone without the skin cancer risk.
The shit in sunscreen is what causes cancer. Johnson & Johnson lost a lawsuit over it. As long as you don’t burn sunlight is good for you.
Also the fats consumed in one’s diet is a hugely important factor. A high PUFA diet will guarantee skin cancer while saturated fats like coconut oil and butter are protective.
Skin cancers caused. by Florescent lighting in offices has rocketed..these people are getting skin cancers in places never exposed to sun.
Cancer is a metabolic issue.
My grandfather died of skin cancer in 1968, what are you even talking about?
I so believe this but try telling your family. I’m considered an idiot because I decide what I’ll do
please don't make claims you have no idea are true or not. skin cancer was around 100 years ago and it is exposure to the sun or chemicals that causes skin cancer. as far as 5 G causing problems it does cause problems when it comes to cancer, but skin cancer is as a problem is verry minor compared to sun and chemical exposures. from 5 G I would be more concerned with brain cancer and Leukemia, Lymphoma, Myeloma that there seems to be a high casualty caused by high intensity bursts of energy used by cell phone technology