It is what he promised, but it was not part of the plan.
It was all for show. By law, by the Cyber Information Security Act (CISA) of 2015, a private entity could monitor and collect the data intrusion vote flip operation. And a private entity could analyze the data in order to understand the attack methodology in order to document for the purpose of developing counter measures to protect information systems.
However, a private entity is prohibited from sharing the raw data for legal and for privacy law concerns with any other entity other than the the Department of Homeland Security.
So, for the past year Lindell and team have been using the PCAP information to gaslight the opposition and to rally MAGA supporters and any law abiding citizen (did you see what I did there) to create a nation-wide grass-roots bottom-up populist movement to fight for equal justice under the law based on their rights as enumerated, guaranteed and protected by the Constitution.
Lindell's data analysts and lawyers filtered the data provided at the Cyber Symposium, removing all information (names, passwords, etc.) they could not share without violating the guidelines detailed in CISA of 2015. This naturally corrupted the data that was provided for outside examination but since it was not raw data it could not be either authenticated or not authenticated. Lindell's 5 million dollar bet was pure side show barking. Very effective side show barking.
When you have time listen to this entire interview with Kirk Wiebe, a retired NSA senior analyst, who provides an articulate and clear explanation on the matter of what can be done and what cannot be done with information that is not the raw data. This interview took place at the Veteran's Alliance Center in Sioux Falls, SD during the Cyber Symposium.
Start at the 09:04 minute mark for the portion speaking directly to the issue of Lindell not providing the raw PCAP data. It starts slow, bear with it, the context is important.
The man Wiebe refers to as having collected the PCAP data that was provided to Mike Lindell, through another person now (but not at that time) associated with Lindell's organization, Brannon Howse, is named Dennis Armstrong.
Listen carefully when Wiebe states he has knows that Dennis Montgomery has been collecting election related PCAP data for two years. The PCAP data that Lindell has been using only covers the time from 2 November through 6 November 2020.
Two years.
Two years worth of data.
Any wonder everyone and their brother is not running for reelection in 2022.
It is what he promised, but it was not part of the plan.
It was all for show. By law, by the Cyber Information Security Act (CISA) of 2015, a private entity could monitor and collect the data intrusion vote flip operation. And a private entity could analyze the data in order to understand the attack methodology in order to document for the purpose of developing counter measures to protect information systems.
However, a private entity is prohibited from sharing the raw data for legal and for privacy law concerns with any other entity other than the the Department of Homeland Security.
So, for the past year Lindell and team have been using the PCAP information to gaslight the opposition and to rally MAGA supporters and any law abiding citizen (did you see what I did there) to create a nation-wide grass-roots bottom-up populist movement to fight for equal justice under the law based on their rights as enumerated, guaranteed and protected by the Constitution.
Lindell's data analysts and lawyers filtered the data provided at the Cyber Symposium, removing all information (names, passwords, etc.) they could not share without violating the guidelines detailed in CISA of 2015. This naturally corrupted the data that was provided for outside examination but since it was not raw data it could not be either authenticated or not authenticated. Lindell's 5 million dollar bet was pure side show barking. Very effective side show barking.
When you have time listen to this entire interview with Kirk Wiebe, a retired NSA senior analyst, who provides an articulate and clear explanation on the matter of what can be done and what cannot be done with information that is not the raw data. This interview took place at the Veteran's Alliance Center in Sioux Falls, SD during the Cyber Symposium.
Start at the 09:04 minute mark for the portion speaking directly to the issue of Lindell not providing the raw PCAP data. It starts slow, bear with it, the context is important.
The man Wiebe refers to as having collected the PCAP data that was provided to Mike Lindell, through another person now (but not at that time) associated with Lindell's organization, Brannon Howse, is named Dennis Armstrong.
Listen carefully when Wiebe states he has knows that Dennis Montgomery has been collecting election related PCAP data for two years. The PCAP data that Lindell has been using only covers the time from 2 November through 6 November 2020.
Two years.
Two years worth of data.
Any wonder everyone and their brother is not running for reelection in 2022.
https://thenewamerican.com/lindell-cyber-symposium-j-kirk-wiebe-retired-nsa-senior-intelligence-analyst-cyber-expert-and-whistleblower/
cc: u/MAGAdeburger u/v8power