Shiva states, one way or the the other, either Lindell is a hoaxer or Lindell has been hoaxed.
"4.2%"
Dr. Shiva has not been on Bannon's Warroom since 08/12/2021.
Dr. Shiva appeared once on The Lindell Report and was interviewed by Mike Lindell shortly after the Arizona Audit Report came out on 09/24/2021 to talk about the results of his (Shiva's) Pima County audit.
The 4.2 % issue about the vote "extrapolations" was not discussed.
And then on 11/17/2021 he was live on youtube with this rather enigmatic url...
It is what he promised, but it was not part of the plan.
It was all for show. By law, by the Cyber Information Security Act (CISA) of 2015, a private entity could monitor and collect the data intrusion vote flip operation. And a private entity could analyze the data in order to understand the attack methodology in order to document for the purpose of developing counter measures to protect information systems.
However, a private entity is prohibited from sharing the raw data for legal and for privacy law concerns with any other entity other than the the Department of Homeland Security.
So, for the past year Lindell and team have been using the PCAP information to gaslight the opposition and to rally MAGA supporters and any law abiding citizen (did you see what I did there) to create a nation-wide grass-roots bottom-up populist movement to fight for equal justice under the law based on their rights as enumerated, guaranteed and protected by the Constitution.
Lindell's data analysts and lawyers filtered the data provided at the Cyber Symposium, removing all information (names, passwords, etc.) they could not share without violating the guidelines detailed in CISA of 2015. This naturally corrupted the data that was provided for outside examination but since it was not raw data it could not be either authenticated or not authenticated. Lindell's 5 million dollar bet was pure side show barking. Very effective side show barking.
When you have time listen to this entire interview with Kirk Wiebe, a retired NSA senior analyst, who provides an articulate and clear explanation on the matter of what can be done and what cannot be done with information that is not the raw data. This interview took place at the Veteran's Alliance Center in Sioux Falls, SD during the Cyber Symposium.
Start at the 09:04 minute mark for the portion speaking directly to the issue of Lindell not providing the raw PCAP data. It starts slow, bear with it, the context is important.
The man Wiebe refers to as having collected the PCAP data that was provided to Mike Lindell, through another person now (but not at that time) associated with Lindell's organization, Brannon Howse, is named Dennis Armstrong.
Listen carefully when Wiebe states he has knows that Dennis Montgomery has been collecting election related PCAP data for two years. The PCAP data that Lindell has been using only covers the time from 2 November through 6 November 2020.
Two years.
Two years worth of data.
Any wonder everyone and their brother is not running for reelection in 2022.
Dr. Shiva is correct in his analysis of the state by state flipped vote counts based on the "extrapolated" and filtered (read pre-approved by Lindell's attorneys) PCAP data presented at the symposium.
Lindell's legal and analytic teams never allowed outside access to any of the cyber security experts invited to "examine" and validate the PCAP metadata at the symposium and has never allowed outside access to date.
Lindell announced several weeks that the PCAP data is, as instructed by the Cyber Information Security Act (CISA) of 22015, when collected by a "private entity"
(15) PRIVATE ENTITY.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, the term ‘‘private
entity’’ means any person or private group, organization, proprietorship, partnership, trust,
cooperative, corporation, or other commercial or nonprofit entity, including an officer,
employee, or agent thereof.
(B) INCLUSION.—The term ‘‘private entity’’ includes a State, tribal, or local government
performing utility services, such as electric, natural gas, or water services.
(C) EXCLUSION.—The term ‘‘private entity’’ does not include a foreign power as defined
in section 101 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801). 129 STAT.
2939
is going to be turned over to the Dept of Homeland Security, in this instance the agency with responsibility for election integrity, and that the PCAP data is not/not part of the Bill of Complaint Lindell's attorneys have presented to State A.G.s for signature and filing with the Supreme Court.
Lindell and his organization used the PCAP data to bird dog where to conduct and concentrate resources to gather evidence and to pressure compromised or corrupt (or both in many instances) officials and provide a venue to encourage innocent witnesses to the voter fraud, vote traffiking, election hacking and rigging that occurred in all 50 states and territories of the U.S., to come forward. Now that they are done with the PCAP data, under CISA instructions, it goes to the Department of Homeland Security.
It has been interesting watching Bannon, Lindell and Dr. Shiva play musical chairs around this issue. Personally, I think it was just all part of the movie.
Dr. Shiva / War Room Interview at Lindell's Cyber Symposium Day 3 / 08/12/2021
https://rumble.com/vl26m7-episode-1167-shocking-developments-coming-out-of-cyber-symposium-today.html (time 39 min 30 sec, no timestamp on rumble)
Shiva states, one way or the the other, either Lindell is a hoaxer or Lindell has been hoaxed.
"4.2%"
Dr. Shiva has not been on Bannon's Warroom since 08/12/2021.
Dr. Shiva appeared once on The Lindell Report and was interviewed by Mike Lindell shortly after the Arizona Audit Report came out on 09/24/2021 to talk about the results of his (Shiva's) Pima County audit.
The 4.2 % issue about the vote "extrapolations" was not discussed.
And then on 11/17/2021 he was live on youtube with this rather enigmatic url...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89MIjiXX-IQ
Read into that what you will.
cc: u/MAGAdeeburger u/v8power
It is what he promised, but it was not part of the plan.
It was all for show. By law, by the Cyber Information Security Act (CISA) of 2015, a private entity could monitor and collect the data intrusion vote flip operation. And a private entity could analyze the data in order to understand the attack methodology in order to document for the purpose of developing counter measures to protect information systems.
However, a private entity is prohibited from sharing the raw data for legal and for privacy law concerns with any other entity other than the the Department of Homeland Security.
So, for the past year Lindell and team have been using the PCAP information to gaslight the opposition and to rally MAGA supporters and any law abiding citizen (did you see what I did there) to create a nation-wide grass-roots bottom-up populist movement to fight for equal justice under the law based on their rights as enumerated, guaranteed and protected by the Constitution.
Lindell's data analysts and lawyers filtered the data provided at the Cyber Symposium, removing all information (names, passwords, etc.) they could not share without violating the guidelines detailed in CISA of 2015. This naturally corrupted the data that was provided for outside examination but since it was not raw data it could not be either authenticated or not authenticated. Lindell's 5 million dollar bet was pure side show barking. Very effective side show barking.
When you have time listen to this entire interview with Kirk Wiebe, a retired NSA senior analyst, who provides an articulate and clear explanation on the matter of what can be done and what cannot be done with information that is not the raw data. This interview took place at the Veteran's Alliance Center in Sioux Falls, SD during the Cyber Symposium.
Start at the 09:04 minute mark for the portion speaking directly to the issue of Lindell not providing the raw PCAP data. It starts slow, bear with it, the context is important.
The man Wiebe refers to as having collected the PCAP data that was provided to Mike Lindell, through another person now (but not at that time) associated with Lindell's organization, Brannon Howse, is named Dennis Armstrong.
Listen carefully when Wiebe states he has knows that Dennis Montgomery has been collecting election related PCAP data for two years. The PCAP data that Lindell has been using only covers the time from 2 November through 6 November 2020.
Two years.
Two years worth of data.
Any wonder everyone and their brother is not running for reelection in 2022.
https://thenewamerican.com/lindell-cyber-symposium-j-kirk-wiebe-retired-nsa-senior-intelligence-analyst-cyber-expert-and-whistleblower/
cc: u/MAGAdeburger u/v8power
Nope...
Dr. Shiva is correct in his analysis of the state by state flipped vote counts based on the "extrapolated" and filtered (read pre-approved by Lindell's attorneys) PCAP data presented at the symposium.
Have you watched the interview - link below
https://rumble.com/vl26m7-episode-1167-shocking-developments-coming-out-of-cyber-symposium-today.html (time 39 min 30 sec, no timestamp on rumble).
Lindell's legal and analytic teams never allowed outside access to any of the cyber security experts invited to "examine" and validate the PCAP metadata at the symposium and has never allowed outside access to date.
Lindell announced several weeks that the PCAP data is, as instructed by the Cyber Information Security Act (CISA) of 22015, when collected by a "private entity"
(15) PRIVATE ENTITY.— (A) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, the term ‘‘private entity’’ means any person or private group, organization, proprietorship, partnership, trust, cooperative, corporation, or other commercial or nonprofit entity, including an officer, employee, or agent thereof. (B) INCLUSION.—The term ‘‘private entity’’ includes a State, tribal, or local government performing utility services, such as electric, natural gas, or water services. (C) EXCLUSION.—The term ‘‘private entity’’ does not include a foreign power as defined in section 101 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801). 129 STAT. 2939
https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Cybersecurity%20Information%20Sharing%20Act%20of%202015.pdf
is going to be turned over to the Dept of Homeland Security, in this instance the agency with responsibility for election integrity, and that the PCAP data is not/not part of the Bill of Complaint Lindell's attorneys have presented to State A.G.s for signature and filing with the Supreme Court.
Lindell and his organization used the PCAP data to bird dog where to conduct and concentrate resources to gather evidence and to pressure compromised or corrupt (or both in many instances) officials and provide a venue to encourage innocent witnesses to the voter fraud, vote traffiking, election hacking and rigging that occurred in all 50 states and territories of the U.S., to come forward. Now that they are done with the PCAP data, under CISA instructions, it goes to the Department of Homeland Security.
It has been interesting watching Bannon, Lindell and Dr. Shiva play musical chairs around this issue. Personally, I think it was just all part of the movie.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7gc7oHPfs0 (55 seconds)
cc: u/MAGAdeburger u/v8power