It’s funny too how their “facts” keep getting more and more abstract and generic. Trump “sought a pay day”. Trump “welcomed” help. They are basically in a position now where they have to back up so far from any specific claim that they are just saying shit now that means almost nothing, but you as the reader are allowed to fill it in with whatever you want. No court is going to say, “Trump - we find you guilty of welcoming!” So there’s no charge there really, but a deranged double-injected TDS leftist steaming behind their mask will read this and picture all sorts of smoky back room, gangster-style conspiracy scenes that make Trump look bad. And it’s all encoded behind words like “welcoming”.

They do this with “racism” too. Their charges have gotten so weak that articles frequently won’t even repeat what was specifically said that is causing such “outrage”. Instead they will provide a negative descriptor of the comments like, “They posted a white supremacist image” or, “They used an anti-Semitic slur.” But they will never show the image or repeat the slur. They want the reader to fill that in for themselves with whatever the worst thing they imagine is. They do this because if they had to show that the “white supremacist image” was just a meme of Pepe eating ice cream and the “anti-Semitic” slur was “elf on the shelf” then it suddenly doesn’t look and sound that bad, even to normies, and the accusers end up looking hysterical, petty, and unserious.