The childrenshealthdefense link doesnt actually link or even say who the judge is
Huh?? Just read through the page fully and you will see it. The name of the judge is literally in the URL itsel!
In an order issued Nov. 12 in Doe et al. v. Austin, U.S. Federal District Judge Allen Winsor of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida denied a preliminary injunction requested by 16 service members against the U.S. Military’s COVID vaccine mandate. A hearing is scheduled for Sept. 14, 2022.
Ummm look at what you just wrote. "DENIED... injunction". That was the service members getting rejected. Where is the actual ruling saying that they aren't equivalent.
Oh, I think I was confused. The military members injunction was denied so it looked like they had lost the case, so I wasn't sure why it was being referenced. It looks like although they were denied the injunction, they also won on the claim that they are in fact not "interchangeable".
Where is the actual ruling from the judge. The childrenshealthdefense link doesnt actually link or even say who the judge is. Anyone have it?
Huh?? Just read through the page fully and you will see it. The name of the judge is literally in the URL itsel!
Ummm look at what you just wrote. "DENIED... injunction". That was the service members getting rejected. Where is the actual ruling saying that they aren't equivalent.
Are you asking a new question or are you doubling down on you previous assertion?
Oh, I think I was confused. The military members injunction was denied so it looked like they had lost the case, so I wasn't sure why it was being referenced. It looks like although they were denied the injunction, they also won on the claim that they are in fact not "interchangeable".