I appreciate that. Let me know when you're finished?
because you're clearly not arguing in good faith.
Wait. Was I arguing with you? I don't think so. I was responding to your comment.
I have no interest in arguing this issue or any other for that matter.
Was I responding in good faith? What's YOUR definition of "good faith"? I responded in good faith - honestly, based on my own views, no intent to manipulate.
I've spent some time looking at Mr Steinbart. I'll do a heavy pass.
I do not spend my time attempting to convince people to "not look at that information". People can do what they want. If you have an issue with others trying to "convince others to not looking at ...", I suggest you take it up with them.
See 2 above. I have no interest in trying to "convince people to not look at ...." If you are somehow conflating my response with your assertion that some people (?) try to convince others not to look (?) because "you might be manipulated emotionally...", well, I appreciate that, because its a straight forward confirmation of my original evaluation of where you are coming from.
If in fact you somehow raised your point 3. in reference to MY comments, well, without being condescending, I have to say, you've 100% misinterpreted my comments.
But to make it clear: I have no interest in AS or in pursuing what AS offers, because I am already convinced from what I DO know that he is full of BS, or that whatever he's selling, frankly, I'm not interested.
You are complaining again, and drawing comparisons that do not enhance your argument, but which undermine it. Grow up.
No comment.
"What victim mentality?" Ah, OK. Hey, its been ok.
I know that you simply cannot see it, but your neediness, your attachment, and your emotionally distorted energy comes through like a loudspeaker. I do hope you find your way.
I appreciate that. Let me know when you're finished?
Wait. Was I arguing with you? I don't think so. I was responding to your comment.
I have no interest in arguing this issue or any other for that matter.
Was I responding in good faith? What's YOUR definition of "good faith"? I responded in good faith - honestly, based on my own views, no intent to manipulate.
I've spent some time looking at Mr Steinbart. I'll do a heavy pass.
I do not spend my time attempting to convince people to "not look at that information". People can do what they want. If you have an issue with others trying to "convince others to not looking at ...", I suggest you take it up with them.
See 2 above. I have no interest in trying to "convince people to not look at ...." If you are somehow conflating my response with your assertion that some people (?) try to convince others not to look (?) because "you might be manipulated emotionally...", well, I appreciate that, because its a straight forward confirmation of my original evaluation of where you are coming from.
If in fact you somehow raised your point 3. in reference to MY comments, well, without being condescending, I have to say, you've 100% misinterpreted my comments.
But to make it clear: I have no interest in AS or in pursuing what AS offers, because I am already convinced from what I DO know that he is full of BS, or that whatever he's selling, frankly, I'm not interested.
You are complaining again, and drawing comparisons that do not enhance your argument, but which undermine it. Grow up.
No comment.
"What victim mentality?" Ah, OK. Hey, its been ok.
I know that you simply cannot see it, but your neediness, your attachment, and your emotionally distorted energy comes through like a loudspeaker. I do hope you find your way.
I doubt you know much about him. Cheers.
Yep. But as much as I want.
Cheers to you, too.