that's why im here to let you all know that Austin Steinbart is an important part of this movement. but there needs to be more free thinkers here to get on board with him before we can move forward.
Youre listening to General Flynn too much. The truth about this matter is not going to come from any mainstream, famous figures- especially not ones with security clearances which prevents them from talking about or even acknowledging classified operations. The truth is going to come when we pry it out, and standing behind someone like Austin is one way to do that.
humor yourself and actually pay attention to him in this interview. Come back and tell me what you disagree with. and remember, this was a hit piece on him- and he still managed to maneuver it with skill.
life itself is a live action role-play so that's not really an argument against him and what he espouses. Nobody else in the movement has a message that even comes close to Austin's (and theres a good reason for this), all you have to do is listen and pay attention.
Why exactly is he a fraud? Do you have anything to back up that claim? Why did Q give Austin two proofs? Are you aware of the the Above&Beyond proof? Is everything that Q says the gospel to you? Where is your discernment? Is disinformation necessary? When do you start thinking for yourself? If Q told you not to trust president trump, would you obey or would you think for yourself? Is Q your master? Did Q say to trust sessions? To trust Barr?
Hmmmm. I don't really think that the one's on board with Mr S, are free thinkers.
Kinda like the sheeple that think THEY are the rational ones, who follow the science and are applying logic.
Well, yes, they are, within a tiny, winey itty bitty little locked off space, one that they cannot conceive outside of. In that little space, they imagine they are free thinkers.
Steinbart, like all conjurors, relies on your emotional defects in order to capture your attention and affection.
youre speaking in generalizations. why is that? is there something specifically you can point to that supports what youre saying? If steinbart was anonymous, would you then consider his information for evaluating? Why do you refuse to evaluate it? Is it because you dislike the messenger? Would you ignore good, pertinent information just because you dont like the source? does that make sense?
my emotions play no role in my consumption and analysis of information. Vacuum it all up, use discernment to find my truth. Truth resonates deeply within. Q should have taught you that. We dont need gatekeepers or arbiters of truth. Free thinking is about learning the truth on your own. Refusing to look into steinbart is counterproductive to learning the truth.
my position is that free thinkers are open to all source of information. There is a solid contingent of people on this sub that are vehemently opposed to speaking about, or looking into anything steinbart says. These people are behaving like the mockingbird media.
"Oy vey! dont look at that information goyim! its poison for your mind! go watch x22 and Jordan Sather to get the inside scoop and make sure to donate some shekels! shalom"
my position is that free thinkers are open to all source of information
You're welcome to your position.
"Open to all sources of information" implies that all sources are equal, and that all forms of information are equal. They are not.
Information messages contain a variety of components (elements). They include the external aspect - the 'information' content - ideas, concepts, thought constructs - but they also include an internal aspect - the 'purpose' content - the intent, origin, direction and objective with which the info aspect is created and then released.
This is how seduction, deception, manipulation work. A manipulator can release factually correct information while the purpose, intent, is to swindle, deceive, ultimately, and gain an unlawful or immoral control or influence over the recipient.
Am I open to all sources of information? Absolutely not. "Open to all sources of information" is the siren song of the Satanists, the Luciferians, and their ilk. "Lucifer deserves a proper hearing, he has been improperly excluded"
This is always how the Marxists, the Communists, and their kind also operate.
This is also how shiesters, tricksters, and those whose motive, whether they know it themselves or not, are ego-centered, selfish, and driven by a selfish purpose.
Curious that you chose to descend into mockery, attack, and a money-driven projection in order to drive your point home. Curious indeed.
"There is a solid contingent of people on this sub are vehemently opposed..."
Curious that you opt for the victim mentality. "Vehemently opposed"? You give yourself far too much importance here.
The truth is: There is a solid contingent in GAW who don't give a crap about AS, and who know shills and bulldust when they see it.
im not going to waste much debating with you because youre clearly not arguing in good faith. nothing you said has anything to do with what I said. so lets try this a different way-
Austin steinbart has put out tons of factual information with sources to back it up
there are a lot of people on GAW that will try to convince you not to look at that information
the reasons they give for that position are weak eg "you might be manipulated emotionally, like the satanists and communists do to people using the truth!"
other people who provide no proprietary information, incorrect decodes, useless prognistication (like praying medic, Jordan Sather, x22, dustin nemos) do not experience the same objection from the people against steinbart even though they all have a financial stake in what they do and Austin does not (didnt q post about people profiting off this movement?)
My humor is an attempt to make people see this. "Ignore the guy giving free, provable information so you can donate to some people who give you nothing!"
what victim mentality? this comment thread is proof of what im saying. Any time anyone mentions Austin steinbart, theres a flood of downvotes and comments warning people he's a larp & to stay away. Strangely enough, none of these comments will touch on the information he shares, and if I attempt to initiate a dialogue with them about it, they ignore/deflect and tell me something about victim mentality. sound familiar?
What is Delta 6? What was McCains role in D6? Does US intelligence traffic drugs and children? Do they use the southern border? What corridor do they use in Yuma? What is the purpose of the Wall? What is MI6? What is the Treaty of Tordesillas? What does this have to do with the Queen Elizabeth? What is House Of Wettin?
its someone who is open to all sources of information. Message over messenger. Most people here are unwilling to listen to him because they disapprove of the message. Shame because his message is far better than anything coming from any other supposed Q influence or politician for that matter. Watch one of his recent interviews, and actually pay attention. try this one with will Sommer, which was designed as a hit piece and watch how Austin redpills on video:
that's why im here to let you all know that Austin Steinbart is an important part of this movement. but there needs to be more free thinkers here to get on board with him before we can move forward.
https://3speak.tv/user/austinsteinbart
lets see how many free thinkers downvote me ;)
First, he writes of QAnon. What is QAnon? Isn't that some fed bait fucktard stuff? Second, he needs to buy a decent microphone.
Youre listening to General Flynn too much. The truth about this matter is not going to come from any mainstream, famous figures- especially not ones with security clearances which prevents them from talking about or even acknowledging classified operations. The truth is going to come when we pry it out, and standing behind someone like Austin is one way to do that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLDT1uuLghk
humor yourself and actually pay attention to him in this interview. Come back and tell me what you disagree with. and remember, this was a hit piece on him- and he still managed to maneuver it with skill.
Steinlarp is a fraud. FFS.
life itself is a live action role-play so that's not really an argument against him and what he espouses. Nobody else in the movement has a message that even comes close to Austin's (and theres a good reason for this), all you have to do is listen and pay attention.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLDT1uuLghk
go on buddy, give it a try.
Steinlarp is a FRAUD. What part of that do you not understand? Q even said so FFS.
Why exactly is he a fraud? Do you have anything to back up that claim? Why did Q give Austin two proofs? Are you aware of the the Above&Beyond proof? Is everything that Q says the gospel to you? Where is your discernment? Is disinformation necessary? When do you start thinking for yourself? If Q told you not to trust president trump, would you obey or would you think for yourself? Is Q your master? Did Q say to trust sessions? To trust Barr?
Hmmmm. I don't really think that the one's on board with Mr S, are free thinkers.
Kinda like the sheeple that think THEY are the rational ones, who follow the science and are applying logic.
Well, yes, they are, within a tiny, winey itty bitty little locked off space, one that they cannot conceive outside of. In that little space, they imagine they are free thinkers.
Steinbart, like all conjurors, relies on your emotional defects in order to capture your attention and affection.
youre speaking in generalizations. why is that? is there something specifically you can point to that supports what youre saying? If steinbart was anonymous, would you then consider his information for evaluating? Why do you refuse to evaluate it? Is it because you dislike the messenger? Would you ignore good, pertinent information just because you dont like the source? does that make sense?
my emotions play no role in my consumption and analysis of information. Vacuum it all up, use discernment to find my truth. Truth resonates deeply within. Q should have taught you that. We dont need gatekeepers or arbiters of truth. Free thinking is about learning the truth on your own. Refusing to look into steinbart is counterproductive to learning the truth.
my position is that free thinkers are open to all source of information. There is a solid contingent of people on this sub that are vehemently opposed to speaking about, or looking into anything steinbart says. These people are behaving like the mockingbird media.
"Oy vey! dont look at that information goyim! its poison for your mind! go watch x22 and Jordan Sather to get the inside scoop and make sure to donate some shekels! shalom"
You're welcome to your position.
"Open to all sources of information" implies that all sources are equal, and that all forms of information are equal. They are not.
Information messages contain a variety of components (elements). They include the external aspect - the 'information' content - ideas, concepts, thought constructs - but they also include an internal aspect - the 'purpose' content - the intent, origin, direction and objective with which the info aspect is created and then released.
This is how seduction, deception, manipulation work. A manipulator can release factually correct information while the purpose, intent, is to swindle, deceive, ultimately, and gain an unlawful or immoral control or influence over the recipient.
Am I open to all sources of information? Absolutely not. "Open to all sources of information" is the siren song of the Satanists, the Luciferians, and their ilk. "Lucifer deserves a proper hearing, he has been improperly excluded"
This is always how the Marxists, the Communists, and their kind also operate.
This is also how shiesters, tricksters, and those whose motive, whether they know it themselves or not, are ego-centered, selfish, and driven by a selfish purpose.
Curious that you chose to descend into mockery, attack, and a money-driven projection in order to drive your point home. Curious indeed.
Curious that you opt for the victim mentality. "Vehemently opposed"? You give yourself far too much importance here.
The truth is: There is a solid contingent in GAW who don't give a crap about AS, and who know shills and bulldust when they see it.
im not going to waste much debating with you because youre clearly not arguing in good faith. nothing you said has anything to do with what I said. so lets try this a different way-
Austin steinbart has put out tons of factual information with sources to back it up
there are a lot of people on GAW that will try to convince you not to look at that information
the reasons they give for that position are weak eg "you might be manipulated emotionally, like the satanists and communists do to people using the truth!"
other people who provide no proprietary information, incorrect decodes, useless prognistication (like praying medic, Jordan Sather, x22, dustin nemos) do not experience the same objection from the people against steinbart even though they all have a financial stake in what they do and Austin does not (didnt q post about people profiting off this movement?)
My humor is an attempt to make people see this. "Ignore the guy giving free, provable information so you can donate to some people who give you nothing!"
what victim mentality? this comment thread is proof of what im saying. Any time anyone mentions Austin steinbart, theres a flood of downvotes and comments warning people he's a larp & to stay away. Strangely enough, none of these comments will touch on the information he shares, and if I attempt to initiate a dialogue with them about it, they ignore/deflect and tell me something about victim mentality. sound familiar?
What is Delta 6? What was McCains role in D6? Does US intelligence traffic drugs and children? Do they use the southern border? What corridor do they use in Yuma? What is the purpose of the Wall? What is MI6? What is the Treaty of Tordesillas? What does this have to do with the Queen Elizabeth? What is House Of Wettin?
"There needs to be more freethinkers to follow this other person over there"
Do you not understand what a freethinker actually is?
its someone who is open to all sources of information. Message over messenger. Most people here are unwilling to listen to him because they disapprove of the message. Shame because his message is far better than anything coming from any other supposed Q influence or politician for that matter. Watch one of his recent interviews, and actually pay attention. try this one with will Sommer, which was designed as a hit piece and watch how Austin redpills on video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLDT1uuLghk
tell me what you disagree with that he says ;)