Merck is not keen on it either. Their friendly fake news tech website Ars Technica wrote about the unfavorable change in outcome data. Marketing's way of setting it up to fail, without saying anything bad about it yourself.
As for the countries that ordered it (Singapore is one), not a peep. Funny, when Merck went guns-blazing on praising it in the early days. Nobody wants to talk about it, thus, it's a failure.
Merck is not defending it in the face of unfavorable news. The pill will be quietly dropped or ignored.
The fact that she speaks out, but is also a WEF asset shouldn't make you feel better about her. She's doing the job that us Anons should be doing, and taking the credit as "The rational Democrat".
Don't you think that some of this might play into the WEF's plan?
I suggest you discuss this with people locally instead of waiting for Big Sister to say it. This is what I do personally. It does make a difference.
Who cares. This medication is bad. Lets people know it is bad and they research it.
Hitler Mao and Stalin can tell me the sky is blue I won't start saying it's black now cause they said it.
More people speaking out about this the better
Tefren why dont you marry Tulsi. You obviously have a hard on for her. You literally only post Tulsi shit.
I mean, there's nothing wrong with a good wank, but don't fall for the pillow talk afterwards.
"Never be fooled by big socialist titties." - u/ProphetOfKek
Yep, don't be a SIMP falling for the commie tits.
Merck is not keen on it either. Their friendly fake news tech website Ars Technica wrote about the unfavorable change in outcome data. Marketing's way of setting it up to fail, without saying anything bad about it yourself.
As for the countries that ordered it (Singapore is one), not a peep. Funny, when Merck went guns-blazing on praising it in the early days. Nobody wants to talk about it, thus, it's a failure.
Merck is not defending it in the face of unfavorable news. The pill will be quietly dropped or ignored.
Yes. Merck is smarter than some companies.
The fact that she speaks out, but is also a WEF asset shouldn't make you feel better about her. She's doing the job that us Anons should be doing, and taking the credit as "The rational Democrat".
Don't you think that some of this might play into the WEF's plan?
I suggest you discuss this with people locally instead of waiting for Big Sister to say it. This is what I do personally. It does make a difference.
Further reading for those interested:
https://oppressed.news/2021/04/news/socialism/reps-dan-crenshaw-and-tulsi-gabbard-were-deep-state-plants/
Bernie Sanders successor no doubt. Keep the Democrats community college wing in the pocket.